Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Gay activists press "Don't Ask" court challenge

Related Topics

Demonstrators listen to a speaker during a protest, urging the Senate not to go on vacation until it passes the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes the repeal of ''Don't Ask, Don't Tell,'' which prevents gay and lesbians from serving openly in the military, on Capital Hill in Washington December 10, 2010. REUTERS/Molly Riley

Demonstrators listen to a speaker during a protest, urging the Senate not to go on vacation until it passes the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes the repeal of ''Don't Ask, Don't Tell,'' which prevents gay and lesbians from serving openly in the military, on Capital Hill in Washington December 10, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

LOS ANGELES | Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:01pm EST

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Weeks after Congress voted to repeal the law banning gays from serving openly in the military, opponents of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" returned to court on Monday seeking to press ahead with their lawsuit against the policy.

The Log Cabin Republicans, a gay rights group that won a landmark federal court decision last year declaring the ban unconstitutional, urged the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to proceed with its review of the legal case despite the repeal.

In opposing the Obama administration's motion to delay further court action on the issue, the group noted that Pentagon officials had warned homosexual service members that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" remains in effect until new rules to carry out the repeal are put in place.

That means gay men and lesbians in uniform who reveal their sexual orientation are still subject to investigation and discharge.

"Although a bill to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" statute has been passed and signed by the president, this legislative 'repeal' is not yet effective," the plaintiffs wrote in their filing.

The Senate gave final congressional approval of a repeal bill on December 18, and President Barack Obama signed it into law the following week, fulfilling a campaign promise to end the 17-year-old policy.

The legislation gave the Pentagon an unspecified amount of time -- perhaps months -- to educate service members and prepare for the policy change, before it "certifies" the repeal. Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said the old law would remain in force.

"They have said they would continue to enforce it," Dan Woods, the group's lead attorney, told Reuters. "They sent memos to members of the service saying, 'If you're gay, don't come out.'" Openly gay individuals also remain barred from enlisting in the service for the time being.

Contrary to the impression left by political fanfare surrounding repeal in December, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell has not been repealed and will likely remain the law of the land until the end of 2011," Woods said.

If the 9th Circuit adheres to an expedited schedule of legal proceedings and briefings set last year in the case, Woods said it was possible the court challenge might prevail before the Pentagon can put new regulations into effect.

Moreover, he said continuing court action is necessary in light of moves threatened by Republican lawmakers to "repeal the repeal" of the gay ban.

Three months before Congress passed the repeal law, a federal judge in California handed gay activists a major victory by ruling that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" infringes on the constitutional free-speech and due-process rights of homosexuals in the armed forces.

U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips put her decision into effect in October by ordering a halt to further enforcement of the ban, briefly forcing the military to welcome openly gay recruits for the first time.

But the 9th Circuit subsequently stayed her injunction, ruling that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" should remain in place pending the outcome of an appeal of the case.

The administration has argued that Congress, rather than the courts, should repeal the ban, once the military completes its plans for an orderly transition to a new policy.

More than 13,000 men and women have been expelled from the military since "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," was instituted during the Clinton administration.

(Editing by Peter Bohan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Panther695823 wrote:
What has this country come to, giving special privilges to a group of people who are not a race! This is the begining of the end of this free country!

Jan 10, 2011 10:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SteveMD2 wrote:
Panther- what are you saying – the coursts should give special priveledges to certain races? Ever heard of equality, part of the founding documents of this country?

Here we have people forced to lie every day as to who they are, yet they are willing to die for their country with people like you that despise them.

Shame on you. America is going to join the 21st century, and not be like the only country in nato except islamic turkey, that makes these good people suffer for the ignorance and bigotry of people like you.

I didn’t see you saying you were going to join the mil to take their place.

And while we are in two wars, we have made a terrible mistake in kicking out 14000 people, some with desperately needed skills – other soldiers have died because of the people who were not available to protect them or do translations etc.

We dont need people like you in this country. You would fit in well with our islamic enemies.

Jan 11, 2011 1:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
SteveMD2 wrote:
Here we have people willing to die for our country – a country that in some ways and with some people who despise them. And some people oppose ending DADT

We’ve also lost not only 13000 desperately needed people, but an estimated 100,000 who would never enlist because they would be forced to lie about who they are, every day, having to watch every word.

And what has race got to do with it – do you think special priveledges should go to special races.

Shame on you for pitching what really is hatred of a minority. As well as supporting flawed policies that have cost us not only 13000 soldiers – some with desperqately needed skills. The lack of which have resulted in some Americans coming home in body bags.

And we are going to be like every last Nato country except Islamic turkey in allowing open service.

Or is your model the Islamic maniacs who attacked our country. Sure sounds like it.

Jan 11, 2011 1:44am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.