China grabs attention with new jet, says it's no threat

BEIJING Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:11am EST

Combination photo shows what is reported to be a Chinese J-20 stealth fighter (top) in Chengdu, Sichuan province, dated January 7, 2011 and a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighter performing a flyby over Daytona Beach, Florida on February 19, 2006. REUTERS/Kyodo/Pierre DuCharme/Files

Combination photo shows what is reported to be a Chinese J-20 stealth fighter (top) in Chengdu, Sichuan province, dated January 7, 2011 and a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighter performing a flyby over Daytona Beach, Florida on February 19, 2006.

Credit: Reuters/Kyodo/Pierre DuCharme/Files

Related Topics

BEIJING (Reuters) - China told the United States on Wednesday its first test-flight of a stealth fighter jet should not be seen as a threat, reiterating it had no intention of challenging U.S. military might in the Pacific.

China confirmed on Tuesday it held its first test-flight of the J-20 stealth fighter jet, a show of muscle during a visit by U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates that sought to defuse military tensions between the two powers.

The flight came against a backdrop of a massive Chinese military modernization program. China's plans to develop aircraft carriers, anti-satellite missiles and other advanced systems have alarmed neighboring countries and Washington.

"China is showing off that its defenses have been strengthened to a high level," said Ahn Yinhay, a professor at Korea University in Seoul.

"The United States has been ... questioning whether China is targeting the U.S., to which China is replying implicitly and explicitly that it is fully equipped with high-tech weapons."

U.S. and Chinese defense-related ships have jostled in seas near China in past years, and in 2001 a mid-air collision between a U.S. surveillance plane and a Chinese air force fighter erupted into a diplomatic standoff.

China has always said its military modernization is needed to protect the country's development and interests, to maintain regional stability as well as to upgrade sometimes woefully outdated equipment.

"The People's Liberation Army has no ability and even more than that, has no intention, to challenge America's territory and global military advantage, and does not have any aims to pursue military hegemony in the region," wrote rear-admiral Yang Yi in a commentary for the overseas edition of the People's Daily.

China's Vice Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai, speaking to reporters ahead of a state visit to the United States by President Hu Jintao next week, repeated that the test flight was not aimed at any country or to coincide with Gates' visit.

"No other country has reason to feel worried or troubled about this. What you've raised (about the stealth flight) had nothing to do with Defense Secretary Gates's visit or with China-U.S. relations," Cui said.

Gates, after a visit to the arm of China's military which oversees its nuclear arsenal, sought to play down tensions between the two countries.

"I think the discussions were very productive and really set the stage for taking the military-to-military relationship to the next level," he said after three days of talks with Chinese military and civilian officials.

In Taiwan, the self-ruled island China has never renounced the use of force to bring under its control, the government said the test flight constituted yet another threat to it.

"China's consistent military expansion creates a threat to Taiwan's security, and we think the international community should give support to Taiwan. This would include Taiwan's ... need to purchase weapons," said Chao Chien-min, deputy chairman of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council.

China cut off ties with the U.S. military for most of 2010 and turned down a proposed fence-mending visit by Gates last summer, because of the Obama administration's proposed $6.4 billion arms package to Taiwan.

News of the stealth fighter's maiden flight caused national pride to swell in China. State radio said some Chinese "shed tears of joy" on the news, while online message boards and blogs brimmed with comments praising the aircraft.


The J-20's test flight prompted some regional analysts to reassess China's military build-up, which includes possible deployment in 2011 of the country's first aircraft carrier and a new anti-ship ballistic missile seen as a threat to U.S. aircraft carriers.

Some have said the development of the J-20 is a strong indicator China is making faster-than-expected progress in developing a rival to Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptor, the world's only operational stealth fighter designed to evade detection by enemy radar.

"If they are successful -- the stealth bomber might not be too stealthy, we have to find out -- it will definitely make it more difficult for United States carriers and long-range assets to operate in this region," said Narushige Michishita of Tokyo's National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.

Some analysts said China's development of new military hardware did not mean China could effectively use its new assets or challenge the balance of power in the Asia-Pacific.

"The J-20 that we saw is not a production model. We don't know whether the jet that was tested was a prototype or was a platform for testing specific technologies," said Matt Durnin, Beijing-based researcher with the World Security Institute.

"It's pretty clear from the images that they have the basic stealth design of the fuselage down, but that alone doesn't mean the aircraft would be especially stealthy," he added.

"I don't think this one aircraft really would dramatically shift the balance of power. Even once it's rolled out there will be questions about whether it stacks up against the predominant stealth fighters of other countries."

U.S. Vice Admiral David Dorsett, director of naval intelligence, has said deployment of the J-20 was years away.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart, Chris Buckley, Huang Yan and Sabrina Mao in Beijing, Linda Sieg in Tokyo, Clare Jim in Taipei and Danbee Moon in Seoul)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
dotjinks wrote:
What will other countries that eventually acquire this technology from China do with it? Isn’t that the question other large countries should be pondering?

Jan 12, 2011 12:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
Nathan_Clark wrote:
Chinese action should always be taken into account. Words are always just verbal overtures. Actions speak louder.

Jan 12, 2011 12:59am EST  --  Report as abuse
biztru wrote:
IF US is strong and the sole superpower while China is strong they won’t need others to analyse their relationship on their behalf. If they can’t speak for themselves, what is there to indicate their strength? For us that do not match up to either US’, China’s or Russia’s military it is better for us to stay out quietly. Making apparent ‘intelligent quotes/analysis’ is no intelligent act.

One, committing remarks before US ask to is jumping the queue ahead of US and that is more disrespect to US than trying to stoke fear and pressure China. Combined with China’s unexpected progress such remarks definitely makes US appear more inadequate in front of the whole wide world as if US is less alert than them or unable to assess the position. Second if US do really require others to raise alarm bells, it insinuates that the US does not carry the same, if not greater, weight than China. Otherwise why would US need to panic? ‘Panic’ is the single most prominent characteristic reserve for only the weak and unseasoned players. Third if any others are that intelligent and powerful, they would have been the one competing with US. Fourth to assume that the world has no eyes or intelligence is a great insult. In reality everyone knows certain countries are very worried and they try to sell their worries to other countries who maybe enjoying excellent relations with both US and China. Why will one with good relations with both US and China want to buy that stupid idea and start taking sides? It is better for them to expect that these two are intelligent enough to spot someone trying play them against one the other than not. Fifth what is there to worry about weapons proliferation, US is the biggest arms trader. One will think F35 is better than J-20. It is also unlikely that China will want to sell their hard learned J-20 technology over the next 10 years and even if they do it will not be any cheaper than the F35 which in any case by now has been tested many more times than the J-20. Even if they do sell probably it will be in some form of technology exchange with only countries like US, Russia, UK, France or Germany or until the sixth generation fighter is up and flying. Sixth between US, EU, Russia and China, they are in a position to form an oligopoly for weapons trade to regulate the entire world’s weapon possession and use. Do they need any advice when they are in unassailable position to dictate the weaponry market? Bless all of you.

Jan 12, 2011 5:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Track China's Leaders