Palin's "blood libel" charge ignites firestorm

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:33pm EST

Former Alaska Governor and 2008 Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin speaks during the National Rifle Association's 139th annual meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina May 14, 2010. REUTERS/Chris Keane

Former Alaska Governor and 2008 Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin speaks during the National Rifle Association's 139th annual meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina May 14, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Keane

Related Video

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Prominent Republican Sarah Palin defended her fiery rhetoric on Wednesday but ignited a fresh controversy by accusing critics of "blood libel" in linking her to a deadly Arizona shooting spree.

A defiant Palin, leaping into a roaring debate on the consequences of overheated political rhetoric, said her critics had been irresponsible in rushing to blame Saturday's gun rampage on vitriolic campaign speech.

"Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn," Palin, a potential 2012 White House contender, said in a video posted to her Facebook page.

Palin's reference to "blood libel," a false, centuries-old allegation that Jews were killing children to use their blood in religious rituals, launched a new round of criticism of Palin's rhetoric.

"We wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history," said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League.

The accusation of "blood libel" has been employed for centuries to justify the killing or expulsion of Jews. The phrase had been used by other conservative commentators, including a Wall Street Journal column, since the shooting of Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who is Jewish.

"Perhaps Palin honestly does not know what a blood libel is, or does not know of their horrific history -- that is perhaps the most charitable explanation we can arrive at," said David Harris, president of the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Suspected Arizona gunman Jared Lee Loughner faces five federal charges in the weekend attack, including the attempted assassination of Giffords, who is in critical condition after being shot in the head while talking to constituents outside a Tucson supermarket.

The rampage fueled a growing debate about whether the heated partisan rhetoric featured in recent U.S. political campaigns can lead to violence, and politicians in both parties have suggested cooling the tone of discourse in Washington.

"Palin's invocation of a 'blood libel' charge against her perceived enemies is hardly a step in the right direction," Harris said.

FOCUS OF CRITICISM

Palin has been a focus of criticism from the left since the shootings for urging followers to "reload," not retreat, after the healthcare debate and publishing an electoral map identifying vulnerable Democratic congressional districts, including Giffords,' with rifle cross-hairs.

The 2008 vice presidential candidate, a favorite of Tea Party conservatives but a lightning rod for liberal critics, has hinted at a presidential run but polls show her trailing many possible Republican rivals and President Barack Obama.

Seated before a fireplace and an American flag, Palin said in the video it was reprehensible for critics to say political rhetoric was to blame for the shootings.

"They claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated? Back in those 'calm days' when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols?" she asked.

Blame for the shooting should not rest "with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle," she said.

Palin had been silent on the shooting for days since posting a message of sympathy for the victims on her Facebook page, even as other Republican presidential contenders spoke out about them.

Former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty was the only potential Republican contender to distance himself from Palin, although subtly. He told The New York Times the crosshairs map was "not a device I would have used."

Palin's comments came on the day Obama headed to Arizona to attend a memorial service for the dead, who included a federal judge, a 9-year-old girl and one of Giffords' young aides. Her colleagues in Congress put most of their work on hold and held a bipartisan prayer service.

Palin was not the only conservative voice to defend campaign rhetoric from the right.

Losing Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle, a Tea Party favorite, condemned criticism of her call during the campaign for "Second Amendment remedies" -- a reference to the constitutional amendment on the right to bear arms.

"Inappropriately attributing blame of a singular tragedy to achieve a political agenda is contrary to civil discourse, and is a media ploy to which I refuse to belong," Angle said in a statement.

(Additional reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (275)
jmmx wrote:
Even now she cannot get away from the extremest terms and rhetoric of anger and self-defensiveness such as “blood libel.”

What is that supposed to mean? She ever paints herself as the victim. HEY! You are not the victim. Tea Partiers ar not the victims!

Jan 12, 2011 9:24am EST  --  Report as abuse
Chris98501 wrote:
What a coward. Her response to this incident has once again demonstrated how poorly equipped she is for any public office. The victim and the victim’s family themselves spoke out against Palin’s “cross-hairs” map — this isn’t a political plot. An apology would have demonstrated some grace, but Sarah can’t accept any responsibility or criticism. It’s quite amusing to see how quickly any comments that are the least bit negative are deleted from her Facebook page. A number of people have been banned from posting on her FB page merely for QUOTING Sarah Palin!

Jan 12, 2011 9:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
mudlark wrote:
That would be why her staffers have been desperately trying to scrub the internet of the violent rhetoric she used. Out damned spot!

Jan 12, 2011 9:34am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures