Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Home foreclosures in 2010 top 1 million for first time

A sign on a foreclosed home is seen in Los Angeles, California, October 25, 2010. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A sign on a foreclosed home is seen in Los Angeles, California, October 25, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

WASHINGTON | Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:32am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Banks seized more than a million U.S. homes in one year for the first time last year, despite a slowdown in the last few months as questions around foreclosure processing arose, a leading firm said on Thursday.

Banks foreclosed on 69,847 properties in December, bringing the year's total to 1.05 million, topping the prior record of 918,000 homes seized in 2009, real estate data firm RealtyTrac said.

The number of foreclosure filings, which includes default notices, auctions and repossessions, was a record 2.9 million last year, including 257,747 filings in December.

"Total properties receiving foreclosure filings would have easily exceeded 3 million in 2010 had it not been for the fourth-quarter drop in foreclosure activity -- triggered primarily by the continuing controversy surrounding foreclosure documentation and procedures that prompted many major lenders to temporarily halt some foreclosure proceedings," said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac.

"Even so, 2010 foreclosure activity still hit a record high for our report, and many of the foreclosure proceedings that were stopped in late 2010,-which we estimate may be as high as a quarter million, will likely be re-started and add to the numbers in early 2011," Saccacio said.

December filings were 2 percent lower than November and 26 percent lower than December 2009.

The firm said Nevada, Arizona and Florida continued to post the highest foreclosure rates in the country.

And just five states -- California, Florida, Arizona, Illinois and Michigan -- accounted for more than half of all foreclosure activity.

One in every 11 housing units in Nevada received at least one foreclosure filing in 2010, more than four times the national average.

In 2005, before the housing bust, banks took over just about 100,000 houses, according to the Irvine, California-based company.

(Reporting by Corbett B. Daly; Editing by Jan Paschal )

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
joao_s wrote:
I find it odd how american government allows this to happen. Tax payers money used to save banks and banks destroys tax payers lives.

Jan 13, 2011 6:33am EST  --  Report as abuse
ahouse1 wrote:
Thankfully most Banks did not follow the rules with regard to proper chain of ownership and due process. Anyone in trouble on their mortgage should be seeking leagal help and contesting every aspect of their mortgage. Amazing enough the AG in CA made it illigal for a home owner in trouble to have forensic audits done on their closing documents without an attorney. So find an attorney and a reputable lender forensics firm that offers a free look at the documents to spot predatory lending and place a fair housing complaint through HUD is critical see lenderforensics.com.

Jan 13, 2011 7:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
It’s actually very simple….the banks are the government! They are killing the “Golden Goose”, I find it difficult to understand why they would do that?? I guess the numbers add for them somehow…

Jan 13, 2011 7:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.