House tones down healthcare debate after shooting

WASHINGTON Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:54pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives, back to work after the attempted assassination of one of its members, on Tuesday staged a toned-down debate on a bill to repeal President Barack Obama's overhaul of the U.S. healthcare industry.

"In the wake of the recent tragedy in Tucson, we come together in a renewed commitment to civility," said Democratic House Leader Nancy Pelosi.

House Republican Leader Eric Cantor agreed, saying, "We're going to be about a decency here and engage and promote active debate on policy."

With the American public split on Obama's landmark healthcare overhaul, House Republicans are on track to keep a 2010 campaign vow and pass the bill to repeal it on Wednesday.

But their measure is certain to die in the Senate, which narrowly remains in the hands of Obama's fellow Democrats in wake of last November's election.

House members spoke forcefully but respectfully about the reform, a major victory for Obama last year that is also one of the most divisive issues in the country.

Rhetoric seemed to be without much of the fire that marked political debate prior to the January 8 shooting in Tucson of Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords. Six other people were killed in the attack that prompted calls for politicians to tone down their rhetoric.

For example, some Republicans on Tuesday no longer referred to the healthcare overhaul as "a job killer" as they had done previously. Instead, they used such phrases as "job stifling."

Republicans argue that federal mandates in the new law would undermine U.S. job growth.

Most Democrats, however, agree with Obama that the new law provides needed medical coverage for millions of Americans.

"I'm willing and eager to work with both Democrats and Republicans to improve the Affordable Care Act. But we can't go backward," Obama said in a statement.

The House had planned to consider the repeal bill last week. But it was abruptly pulled from consideration after the January 8 shooting spree in Arizona. The accused gunman is a troubled college dropout.

A motive has not been determined in the rampage. But many noted that Giffords and other Democrats who had backed Obama on healthcare were targeted for defeat in last year's election.

"STRONG FEELINGS"

While repeal is widely expected to fail, Republicans will try to starve funding for the healthcare reform and chip away at elements of it in Congress. [nN18137353] But it is under more threat from a series of legal challenges than congressional action.

The Obama administration appealed a ruling by a federal judge in Virginia that declared unconstitutional a key part of the healthcare law.

Speaking with reporters shortly before the House debate began, Cantor said, "Obviously there are strong feelings on both sides of the bill and we expect the debate to ensue along policy lines. There are going to be some policy differences."

Cantor added, "Republicans care about healthcare."

But he said, "We want to do it in a way that lowers health costs, that increases access and emphasizes the doctor-patient relationship -- none of which do we feel that the Obamacare bill does."

Democrat Representative Loretta Sanchez, speaking on the House floor, told of a single mother whose epileptic daughter would not have insurance without the new healthcare law.

Raising her voice, Sanchez said, "If this was your daughter, you would not repeal this healthcare reform!"

(Writing by Thomas Ferraro; editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
rht457 wrote:
Affordable Care Act provides these benefits, Where’s the republican plan?
http://www.healthcare.gov/
1. Ensure that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care.
2. Create a new, regulated marketplace where consumers can purchase affordable health care.
3. Extend much needed relief to small businesses. Tax credits of up to fifty percent for employers.
4. Improve Medicare by helping seniors and people with disabilities afford their prescription drugs.
5. Prohibit denials of coverage based on pre-existing conditions.
6. Limit out-of-pocket costs so that Americans have security and peace of mind.
7. Help young adults by requiring insurers to allow all dependents to remain on their parents plan until age 26.
8. Expand Medicaid to millions of low-income Americans. Currently the national median income for parental eligibility is $11,718 per year for a family of three in 2010.
9. Provide sliding-scale subsidies to make insurance premiums affordable.
10. Hold insurance companies accountable for how our health care dollars are spent. Must spend 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care and quality improvements
11. Clamp down on insurance company abuses. Health insurers WellPoint Inc., UnitedHealth Group, and Assurant Inc. “cancelled the coverage of more than 20,000 people, allowing the companies to avoid paying more than $300 million in medical claims over a five-year period.” This insurance company practice affects thousands of people every year. The investigation went on to reveal some of the reasons that these policyholders were dropped.
• “A Texas nurse said she lost her coverage, after she was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer, for failing to disclose a visit to the dermatologist for acne.”
• “The sister of an Illinois man who died of lymphoma said his policy was rescinded for the failure to report a possible aneurysm and gallstones that his physician noted in his chart but did not discuss with him.”
12. Invest in preventive care.

Jan 18, 2011 7:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.