New climate data shows warming world: WMO

GENEVA Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:38am EST

Boys cool themselves in a fountain at All-Russian Exhibition Centre in Moscow, July 16, 2010. REUTERS/Denis Sinyakov

Boys cool themselves in a fountain at All-Russian Exhibition Centre in Moscow, July 16, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Denis Sinyakov

GENEVA (Reuters) - Last year tied for the hottest year on record, confirming a long-term warming trend which will continue unless greenhouse gas emissions are cut, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said on Thursday.

The first 10 years of the millennium proved to be the hottest decade since records began in the 19th century, it said.

"The main signal is that the warming trend continues and is being strengthened year after year," WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud told a news conference.

"The trend, unfortunately, will continue for a number of years but the amplitude will depend on the amount of greenhouse gases released," the Frenchman added. "It will depend on action taken to minimize the release of greenhouse gases."

Jarraud said the latest data should convince doubters about the growing evidence for man-made climate change. "If they look at it in an unbiased way, it should convince them, or hopefully a few of them, that the skeptical position is untenable."

2010 was also marked by further melting of Arctic ice -- in December its extent was at its lowest on record, the WMO said -- and by extreme weather, including Russia's heatwave and devastating floods in Pakistan.

Rising temperatures, already about 0.8 degree Celsius above pre-industrial times, mean the world will struggle to limit warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, a target agreed by almost 200 nations at U.N. talks last month in Mexico.

Many experts see 2C as a threshold for dangerous climate change, like more heatwaves, droughts, floods and rising seas.

"We have to act very fast and strongly" to limit emissions, said Bob Ward, of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

He noted that many skeptics say global warming has stopped because of no new records since 1998, when temperatures were boosted by a strong El Nino event that warms the Pacific.

"But they cannot explain away the fact that nine of the 10 warmest years have occurred since 2000," he said.

"Data received by the WMO show no statistically significant difference between global temperatures in 2010, 2005 and 1998," the United Nations body, which compiles its ranking from data provided by British and U.S. agencies, said in a statement.

Data from British institutes on Wednesday showed last year was the world's second warmest behind 1998, while the other two main groups tracking global warming, based in the United States, said 2010 was tied for the hottest on record.

Over the 10 years from 2001 to 2010, global temperatures have averaged 0.45 degrees Celsius (0.83 degrees Fahrenheit) above the 1961-1990 average and are the highest ever recorded for a 10-year period since climate records began, WMO said.

The difference between the three hottest years was less than the margin of uncertainty in comparing the data, according to WMO, whose assessment is based on climate data from land-based weather and climate stations, ships, buoys and satellites.

The fight against global warming suffered a setback in the wake of the financial crisis, slowing funding for renewable energy projects and knocking momentum from international efforts to agree a climate deal to succeed the Kyoto Protocol in 2013.

(Additional reporting by Alister Doyle in Oslo; Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Janet Lawrence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (8)
TomG2 wrote:
The Blackstone Group last week helped the Chinese buy a solar panel company, Elkem, from its Norwegian parent company, Orkla, for $2B. Elkem’s silicon chips are made using a lot less carbon than the norm. Apparently the smart money believes solar is a good investment, and low carbon emissions are a good idea. What does your money believe? That tobacco is a matter of personal responsibility? That guns don’t kill people? That global warming is a hoax? Your money may be talking louder than you are, especially if it is invested in News Corp. You might want to check what your money is saying about people like you, and who your money is voting for.
Meanwhile the CEO of Orkla said China’s human rights record wasn’t an issue in the negotiations.

Jan 20, 2011 7:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
bsbailey wrote:
Saying 2010 was the hottest year since records have been kept is a red herring – interesting but useless information that disregards the facts. Climate change happens on a geologic scale measured in hundreds of thousands of years, so looking at data that only spans the last century does not provide a trend. The last ice age ended approximately 9000 years ago (when the Great Lakes were created) and we are now in an interglacial warming period – so we should be warming up. The last warming trend peaked out 120,000 years ago (during the last interglacial period) and the planet was warmer then than it is now. Fossil fuels and carbon emissions can not be blamed for that one. We will continue to see a gradual warming for several thousands of years before the next peak and the planet starts cooling and sliding back into the next ice age. So warming is not unusual, nor is it news. It’s just inconvenient for humans. Receding glaciars are part of the natural process – glaciers are nothing more than leftover remnants of the last ice age. When we talk about “climate change” and “global warming” we have to look far beyond our lifetime and realize that the planet will continue to warm for many generations regardless of any emergency measures we take to stop the warming.

Jan 20, 2011 8:28am EST  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
If the US (and others) are intellectually honest about reducing carbon emissions we should lower the freeway speed limits nationwide to say 62.5 mph or 100 kilometers max 50 states! We’d get an instant -5-10% reduction in vehicle emissions, it saves lives, reduces oil consumption, it’s cheap to do, fair and proven-see massive data if ya doubt! Vehicle emissions spike and fuel mileage drops significantly on most vehicles above 60 mph folks! I’m willing to give up some freedom to reduce emissions and oil consumption even if environmentalist are wrong! Thanks, pretty far right wing conservative (suprise, but true-see all my posts-I’m a pest lately) I work with test engineers in trucking regarding emissions FYI You don’t get the reductions so much with big rigs @ 60 FYI-different challenge.

Jan 20, 2011 2:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow