South Carolina governor sued over hostility to unions

CHARLESTON, South Carolina Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:50pm EST

Related Topics

CHARLESTON, South Carolina (Reuters) - South Carolina unions filed suit on Thursday against new Republican Governor Nikki Haley and her administration, saying hostility toward unions and workers joining unions is unconstitutional.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers and the South Carolina AFL-CIO alleges that Haley is violating the federal constitutional and statutory rights to free speech, free association and due process.

South Carolina is one of 22 "Right to Work" states and Haley said she will ensure that South Carolina workers are not compelled to join a union.

"We believe there's no basis to this suit, and if the machinists are offended that the governor doesn't think unions are a good thing in South Carolina, they're just going to have to get used to it," said Gov. Haley's spokesman Rob Gregory.

At issue is whether a new Boeing assembly plant for the company's 787 Dreamliner aircraft will be unionized. After a long battle, Boeing in 2009 selected South Carolina as the site of a 787 final assembly plant. The company aims to ramp up 787 production to 10 planes per month in 2013.

The plant in South Carolina is expected to create thousands of new jobs, and machinists in South Carolina voted against representation by the union.

The lawsuit asks the court to compel the South Carolina state government to remain neutral in enforcing state employment laws.

"The right to organize is protected by federal law and she (Haley) does not have the right to select which laws she would enforce and which ones to ignore," IAM spokesman Frank Larkin said.

(Reporting and Writing by Harriet McLeod, Editing by Greg McCune)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
douglynn wrote:
What we need is loser pays in our courts to stop all these ignorant, expensive lawsuits.

The governor has free speech rights too. She never said that she was going to ignore any laws. Democrat politicians are the ones that ignore their own laws whenever it suits their new needs. Democrats are the ones that think the law and the constitution are flexible and can be reinterpreted by lawyers in black robes, as long as it suits their purposes. This is a clear case of projection.

Conservatives like the law to be clear and unambiguous, to produce a level playing field. Liberals like vague, bendable laws that only they have the knowledge to fully understand, appreciate and apply.

Jan 23, 2011 12:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus