Judge temporarily delays loan document shredding

WILMINGTON, Delaware Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:01pm EST

A packet sent out to home owners in default of mortgage payments sits on the table of Margery Rotundo, senior Vice President of Residential Loss Mitigation at national subprime loan servicer Ocwen Financial Corporation, in West Palm Beach September 10, 2009. REUTERS/Hans Deryk

A packet sent out to home owners in default of mortgage payments sits on the table of Margery Rotundo, senior Vice President of Residential Loss Mitigation at national subprime loan servicer Ocwen Financial Corporation, in West Palm Beach September 10, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Hans Deryk

WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) - A U.S. bankruptcy judge temporarily blocked bankrupt subprime lender Mortgage Lenders Network USA from destroying 18,000 boxes of original loan files after federal prosecutors said documents in them may be needed as evidence in more than 50 criminal investigations.

In a hearing Monday before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Peter J. Walsh, a representative from the Delaware U.S. Attorneys' Office said she did not know details of any of the investigations.

But she said prosecutors and FBI offices around the country had requested time to access to the boxes and assess whether the contents contain needed evidence before the judge permits any destruction.

Walsh granted a 30-day delay, and said he would hold another hearing on Mortgage Lenders' request.

A series of recent court rulings have increased the importance of original loan documents, holding that they are essential for investors to prove ownership of mortgages and to have the right to foreclose.

Connecticut-based Mortgage Lenders Network closed down and filed for bankruptcy protection in February 2007, and now is being liquidated.

Dozens of subprime lenders went out of business in 2007 with the collapse of the housing market. There is increasing tension as trustees for several of these defunct lenders seek to destroy documents to save storage costs, while law enforcement officials and advocates for homeowners and investors in mortgage-backed securities argue that the documents should be preserved.

Concern about missing mortgage documents emerged beginning in October 2010, with disclosures that large numbers of original loan documents were missing and that falsified ones were being submitted in foreclosure cases.

In a separate hearing Monday in the same court, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi allowed defunct American Home Mortgage, once one of the largest subprime lenders, to destroy most of the 4,100 boxes of original loan files it still has.

But the judge granted a request by Margaret Becker, a lawyer in Staten Island for the Legal Aid Society, to require the American Home trustee to set aside and cull through a few hundred of the boxes which may contain records still relevant to possible foreclosures.

Becker said many low income homeowners were victims of deception about how much their loans actually would cost, and records from the boxes could help prove that they had been defrauded.

"These documents are critical for borrowers to demonstrate to foreclosing courts the deception and fraud that was a routine part of this mortgage industry," Becker said.

Sean Beach, a lawyer for American Home's liquidation trustee, said the company under an earlier court order already had destroyed or returned to loan servicers 50,000 boxes of "hard copy loan files."

(Reporting by Scot J. Paltrow; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
oldeurope wrote:
If they destroy these original documents then they should forfeit the right to get repaid for the loan. It’s not the cost of storing the documents…it’s being afraid of the mischief they created!

Jan 24, 2011 10:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BOBBY99 wrote:
Banks change the rules, manipulate money, hide, cheat, take for obscure reasons which could be proved if not for the sheer cost.
Consumers should control all bank regulation.
Bankers who don’t like it could always get a job.
bobby99

Jan 25, 2011 2:28am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.