Sponsored Links

U.N. chief condemns rights expert's 9/11 comments

Related Topics

UNITED NATIONS | Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:49pm EST

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned "preposterous" comments by a U.N.-appointed expert on Palestinian rights that there was a cover-up over the September 11 attacks, Ban's chief of staff said on Monday.

The official, Vijay Nambiar, said however that it was not up to Ban to fire the expert, U.S. academic Richard Falk, as demanded by UN Watch, a Geneva-based advocacy group.

Falk wrote in a blog this month that there had been an "apparent cover-up" by U.S. authorities over the September 11, 2001 attacks, in which hijackers flew airliners into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon near Washington.

He said mainstream media had been "unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials."

In a letter to Ban last Thursday, UN Watch director Hillel Neuer called on the U.N. chief to "strongly condemn Mr. Falk's offensive remarks -- and ... immediately remove him from his post."

A letter of reply from Nambiar said Ban "condemns (Falk's) remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous -- and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."

Nambiar said Falk and other rights experts were not appointed by Ban but by the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, a 47-nation body created by the U.N. General Assembly in 2006. "Their continuance in their jobs is thus for the Council to decide," he added.

UN Watch says on its website it is a non-governmental organization, accredited with the United Nations and affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, that aims to monitor U.N. performance against the yardstick of the U.N. Charter.

It supports U.N. goals but frequently criticizes the Human Rights Council, saying it constantly berates Israel but ignores many rights violations by developing countries. It has often targeted Falk, the council's special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, for anti-Israeli comments.

In a statement, Neuer welcomed Nambiar's letter but said the Human Rights Council could not be trusted to fire Falk. He said Ban and U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay had "the power and responsibility to play an influential and decisive role."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
If there is anybody having problems acknowledging the “well-evidenced doubts” of 9/11, find out what over 1400 licensed and practicing architects and engineers are saying:

http://www.ae911truth.org

Let’s have UN Watch comment on the evidence found.

Jan 24, 2011 9:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MrComments wrote:
There was a cover-up. Of the politically embarrassing ties of some members of the Saudi Royal family, and of the involvement of many members of Pakistan’s ISI (including the head, or wired money to Mohammed Atta). There is also the major cover-up of the numerous and quite specific warnings given to the Bush Admin. It was common knowledge and attack was coming, even Judith Miller has said that. But then there is the absurd notion that there were “controlled demolitions”, “missiles”, “Stand Downs”, “Shoot Downs”, etc. This is where these people go off the deep end. These theories have zero credibility, and until all the “Truth Seekers” acknowledge that they are selling a lot of BS, they have zero credibility. Zero.

Jan 24, 2011 11:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Life1 wrote:
@ MrComments:

Could you please give me one other date in human history where planes were proven to have vaporized and vanished entirely on impact OR three skyscrapers collapsed at free-fall speed because of fire?

Nevermind showing me another date where they all happened in the same day, for the first time ever.

But….. whatever makes you sleep at night! God bless America.

Jan 25, 2011 1:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.