U.S. border cop fired over drug war views files lawsuit

Related Topics

A U.S. Border Patrol truck drives near the border fence between San Luis, Arizona and San Luis Rio Colorado, Mexico November 9, 2010. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

A U.S. Border Patrol truck drives near the border fence between San Luis, Arizona and San Luis Rio Colorado, Mexico November 9, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

PHOENIX | Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:20am EST

PHOENIX (Reuters) - A former U.S. Border Patrol agent who said he was fired because of his views on drug legalization and illegal immigration, has filed a lawsuit against his former employer alleging unlawful dismissal.

In the suit brought jointly with the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico on January 20, Bryan Gonzalez seeks undisclosed damages for his September 2009 dismissal arguing that it violated his first amendment rights to free speech.

"It had nothing to do with my work ... the only thing I was fired for was my comments," Gonzalez, 26, who grew up in El Paso, Texas, across the border from Mexico's most violent city, Ciudad Juarez, said in an interview on Thursday.

"I believe that the drug war just hasn't worked, and I think it's important for people to realize that it hasn't worked," he said.

The suit names Victor M. Manjarrez Jr., chief patrol agent for the Border Patrol's El Paso sector as defendant. Reuters contacted the sector, but a spokesman declined to comment as the issue was under litigation.

Gonzalez, whose mother is a naturalized U.S. citizen from Mexico, held dual U.S. and Mexican citizenship until the age of 18. He began working as a Border Patrol agent in October 2007, and was still a probationary agent when he was fired less than two years later.

His suit alleges that the dismissal followed a conversation with a colleague, agent Shawn Montoya, during a work break in April 2009, in which he said he thought legalizing drugs would end cartel violence south of the border.

He also remarked to Montoya that he understood the economic factors that drive undocumented migrants to cross the U.S. border to seek work -- although he says his views did not affect his ability to police the border.

"I was paid to do a job, and my opinions had no interference with the ability to do my job, just like any soldier can disagree with the war and still fight the war," Gonzalez told Reuters, adding that he had received only positive monthly and quarterly reviews for his work.

GRILLED OVER POLITICS

Montoya reported Gonzalez's comments on to a supervisor, who informed the Joint Intake Command in Washington, according to the lawsuit. The Office of Internal Affairs launched an investigation soon after.

A few months later, Gonzalez said he was ordered to attend an interview with internal affairs, which he described as "more of an interrogation than anything."

"I was grilled upon my political stance, I was even asked ... if I had plans to overthrow the government," he said.

The Border Patrol fired him on September 16 2009, just weeks before his probationary period expired.

His termination letter stated, in part, that he held "personal views that were contrary to the core characteristics of Border Patrol agents, which are patriotism, dedication, and esprit de corps," according to the lawsuit.

Curbing raging drug cartel violence, which has killed more than 34,000 people in Mexico since late 2006, is key concern to both Washington and Mexico City

Speaking more than a year after he was fired, Gonzalez says the "tragedy" unfolding in El Paso's sister city of Ciudad Juarez, where more than 3,000 people were slaughtered last year in drug-related violence, was "devastating."

"It is ... something that I saw every day. All the violence that is happening hit home very much ... it's devastating to know that the city is pretty much a war zone."

He says he has no regrets at expressing his views on the war on drugs and illegal immigration. Asked if he feels bitterness toward his former employers, he pauses.

"I'm still dumbfounded at the fact that you can be fired for having an opinion. I thought having an opinion was the American way."

(Editing by Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
aday85 wrote:
Wish I could say I was surprised by this. The War on Drugs is dogma, and the establishment couldn’t care less about any actual evidence or reasoning for or against it. The goal is to stop people from getting high in any way, regardless of how many pawns and bystanders get slaughtered in the process. It has been a total, complete, devastating failure since day one, but not one person in the establishment will ever admit it. In 100 years, we will look back at the Drug War and judge it at least as harshly as the Inquisition and the witch hunts. Not to mention the way that it perpetuates poverty in the US…

Jan 27, 2011 11:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
ColleenMcCool wrote:
The problem is an epidemic in law enforcement. One can not reform justice from the ranks.

I am afraid; murderers and other violent predators roam free, while we police nonviolent adult social, medicinal and religious drug use. That’s real soft-on-crime, soft-in-the-head, out-of-control, historically ignorant policy. Notice alcohol distributors no longer kill off the competition.

Demented prohibition supports despicable people who sell drugs to children, recruit them to sell to their peers and arm them to kill the competition. Society is caught betwixt and between in this scandalous, senseless morally bankrupt war on some drugs. Across America paramilitary drug raids trigger violence rather than lessen the risk. It is overkill, to use such force on a nonviolent health issue.

Drug war violence is a policy created problem! All this unconscionable bloodshed is on the hands of leadership as much as those who pulled the trigger or contributed in other ways to the unnecessary. monsterous death toll.

Regulation, science based education and treating abuse as a medical problem is a better drug policy; increasing public safety and harm reduction plus freeing up billions in wasted funds to use incarcerating violent predators and the morally bankrupt who sell drugs to children or drive intoxicated.

Now is the time to insist American warriors get their adrenaline rush catching murderers, child molesters and rapist. I understand it will not be possible to stop all of these heinous crimes. However, get tough-on-violent-crime! Restore Justice, the guardian of liberty! Restore public safety.

Join LEAP, COP and DownSizeDC!

Jan 27, 2011 12:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
HernandezUSA wrote:
Dear G*D does no one the government do backgrounds checks?

This MAN NEVER should have been a Border Patrol agent!

You CANT have a coyote watching the other coyotes to make sure they don’t get in the hen house.

Jan 27, 2011 3:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.