Ron Paul gloomy on deficit outlook, sees crisis

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:40pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A world currency crisis awaits if the U.S. Congress and the White House do not balance the federal budget soon and that appears unlikely, Representative Ron Paul said in an interview on Thursday.

The iconoclastic Texas Republican also told Reuters he expects wide support for a bill he has reintroduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to allow greatly expanded scrutiny of the Federal Reserve by Congress' investigative wing.

Paul was recently named chairman of the House domestic monetary policy subcommittee that oversees that issue.

He said President Barack Obama's remarks on the deficit, expected to hit $1.48 trillion this year, in his State of the Union speech "was a lot of the same old stuff."

As for his fellow Republicans and the deficit problem, Paul said, "They had their chance and didn't do much."

"I think the deficit is going to continue to grow," Paul said. "I am anticipating that we will have a dollar currency crisis that's going to be worldwide and the world will be forced to have monetary reform, and we're getting closer to that all the time."

He said he was "undecided" on whether he will run again for president, an office he has twice sought unsuccessfully. Rand Paul, Paul's son, was elected to the Senate last year from Kentucky. Both father and son are prominent figures in the conservative Tea Party movement.

Paul cuts an unusual figure in U.S. politics. The 75-year-old obstetrician is a libertarian with strong views about monetary policy, the gold standard and the Federal Reserve. He collides often with Democrats and Republicans.

SENATE RUN?

He told The Dallas Morning News this week that he was considering running for the Senate.

He has reintroduced legislation in the House calling for a full audit by Congress' Government Accountability Office of the Federal Reserve to be reported to Congress by the end of 2012. Rand Paul has introduced a companion bill in the Senate.

The House version has 55 co-sponsors, mostly Republicans but also some Democrats. No Republican leaders have signed on, but House Financial Services Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus has, and Paul said that is a promising sign.

He said he expects the measure to appeal to newly elected House Republicans swept into office by the Tea Party movement.

"We should get a lot of them on. It's hard to beat what we did last year because we had every single Republican in the House and a bunch of Democrats. I think the momentum is still there. People want transparency," he said.

He said he assumes the bill, with Bachus' support, will come to a vote at the full financial services committee level. Approval would send it to the House floor. "It will always have more trouble in the Senate," he said.

On the deficit, he said, "It's just going to get worse because some things are just out of control. Republicans won't touch the military and the other side can't stand the idea of any welfare being cut ... Interest rates will be going up."

He acknowledged that bond markets, with yields low and demand still strong for U.S. Treasuries, show little or no sign of worrying about a global economic disaster.

"That is true," he said. "One reason is other countries have it as bad if not worse.

"We are the reserve currency. That gives us a special status. We're still the military power of the world and that has been known to convey confidence in a currency when it's undeserving. Things could change rather quickly.

"That's why the odds are about 99 percent that we'll have a currency crisis before we come to our senses. Then we'll have to do something. We'll have to have monetary reform."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
DrJJJJ wrote:
Takes a crisis for people/countries to change Paul!! The magnitutde of the crisis is still not great enough for change! There must be widspread ugly civil unrest and greaat suffering now to stop the spending-doesn’t appear anything short of this will do the trick! Too many of our politican think you can blow another revenue bubble with massive government spending-those days are long gone! Ask Madoff how well that model works!!

Canada was in similar finacial crisis, found the will to cut spending and IT WORKED FYI!! Europe starting to figure it out too!! Our egos are too big and we’ve had it too good!! Lack of decent morals &ethics too!

Jan 27, 2011 5:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
Does any of the world outside of the rather backwards nation of Texas care what Ron Paul has to say?

His understanding of economics is as backwards as his dedication to civil rights and justice. Which is non-existent.

Jan 27, 2011 5:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
In The Coming Economic Earthquake (Moody Press, Chicago, I11. • 1991), Burkett delineated growing federal deficits and the ever increasing use of debt by business and households out of control. Burkett points out those severe economic times will appear sometime shortly after the millennium unless current polices are changed. Burkett believed that Keynesian economic policies, with ideals for continuing federal deficits and the implicit preference for higher levels of consumption, reduced saving, and a larger role for government in the economy are a means to disaster. As Burkett states in the book that as interest on the debt consumes a larger and larger portion of the yearly federal budget, and more money is borrowed each year to pay the interest on what was borrowed in previous years, there will be a temptation to “monetize” the debt at an increasing rate leading to a calamity not seen since the Great Depression. Burkett questioned whether or not elected leaders would take action in time to prevent fiscal chaos, and believed they would not.

Jan 27, 2011 5:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.