Analysis: Bad neighborhood risks getting worse for Israel

Related Topics

JERUSALEM | Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:39am EST

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel is sitting uneasily in the eye of a storm as unrest and uncertainty spread around its Arab neighbors.

Political turmoil in Lebanon has strengthened Israel's Iranian-backed enemy Hezbollah, while a leak of hundreds of sensitive documents has dented the leadership of its frustrated peace partner, the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

Attention has now swung down to the south, where its longest-standing Arab ally, Egypt, has been jolted by nationwide anti-government protests.

While the upheaval in Lebanon has caused concern, the fear of serious strife in Egypt has set alarm bells ringing.

"The Israeli strategic community is praying that this unrest in Egypt will fade away and not escalate into a prolonged period of instability," said Gidi Grinstein, the founder and president of the respected Reut Institute think tank.

"Instability in Egypt dramatically transforms the strategic environment in Israel."

Israel has long sought normal relations with its neighbors, but Egypt was its only Arab associate until the peace process launched by the 1993 Oslo interim accords led to a treaty with Jordan and a handful of other Arab countries.

However Egypt, which shares a long, desert border with Israel, remains by far its most important Middle East partner -- a regular facilitator in interminable peace negotiations and until now a rock of stability in an otherwise turbulent area.

NO FUTURE GUARANTEES

Israeli officials say in private they cannot believe that President Hosni Mubarak will be overthrown by the demonstrations, inspired by a popular uprising in Tunisia.

But if he should fall, there is no guarantee that whoever might follow him will continue to tend to Israel ties.

Ordinary Egyptians have never warmed to Israel, despite more than three decades of peace, and regularly blame it for their woes. Recently some even suggested that Israel might have trained a killer shark to terrorize a top tourist resort.

The main opposition force in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood, has said it would put the 1978 Camp David peace accords to a referendum if it took power.

"If Mubarak is toppled then Israel will be totally isolated in the region," said Alon Liel, a former director-general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry and a former ambassador to Turkey.

"That would not represent a security threat, but it would be a political blow, coming on top of our growing international isolation, and also a psychological blow to the Israeli public."

The few Israeli ministers to have spoken publicly about the situation have refused to speculate about Mubarak's future and sought to shift attention back to Lebanon, where a dramatic power grab has put Iran-backed Hezbollah in the driving seat.

"I think what is happening in Lebanon is worse than what is happening in Egypt," Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom told Israeli Army Radio.

"Because, in Lebanon, a terrorist organization has taken over and will take control of security forces while getting its instructions from Iran, which calls for Israel to be wiped off the map."

STATE-ON-STATE

Israel has already fought one war with Hezbollah in 2006, in which more than 1,200 Lebanese died, the bulk of them civilians, and parts of south Lebanon and Beirut were devastated. One hundred and sixty Israelis, mostly soldiers, were also killed.

A ceasefire is in force. But Israel complains that the Shi'ite Muslim group has managed to secure thousands of missiles powerful enough to strike deep into Israeli territory. It fears this arsenal could be unleashed at Iran's command.

Paradoxically, Grinstein said the likely creation of a Hezbollah-backed government in Lebanon could strengthen Israel's position by turning its conflict with the Shi'ite group into a conventional state-on-state confrontation.

When there was a Western-backed government in Beirut, Israel felt obliged to focus retaliation on Hezbollah targets, he said. Such restraints would now dissolve.

"So the strength of Israeli deterrence has just increased," he said.

What hasn't increased is any hope that the startling changes being seen in the Middle East might provide a spur to the peace process, which ground to a halt last year over the issue of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

The huge uncertainty in the region means now is not the time to push forward with broad peace initiatives, said Oded Eran, director of the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies.

"Clearly the winds of change are blowing," he said.

"If I were in the Israeli government, I would say that there are very strong signs of instability, so it is difficult for us in strategic terms to take long-term decisions that alter the situation dramatically between us and our neighbors."

(Editing by Kevin Liffey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AlexVallas wrote:
Israel has never acted in good faith in efforts to resolve the Palestinian issue. Their negotiations are designed to take 90% and give 10%. They may soon find themselves in a less powerful position. Virtually the entire world, less the US, is tired of the political and economic repercussions generated by this conflict. The Obama Administration, rightfully so, has been more vocal in objecting to the occupation of Palestine. Members of the Tea Party would like to see the US cut all foreign aid, including the billions of dollars going to Egypt and Israel. Israel’s actions are forcing more Arab countries to move towards radical anti-Western governments. Let’s hope Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Algeria and Yemen don’t take the route of Iran.

Jan 28, 2011 6:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
pinksalute wrote:
What “Palestinian” land? What makes it “Palestinian”? And why do the “Palestinians” need it? They have all of Jordan, which is five or six times the size of Israel, with about the same number of people. There is plenty of room in Jordan. And they’ll be right at home there, because 70% of Jordanians are “Palestinians”, including the queen. In the meantime, where are Israelis supposed to live, work, and grow?

Jan 28, 2011 10:44am EST  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
pinksalute – your comment is simultaneously stupid, naive and arrogant. Why was it ever considered good statecraft to create a country that depends on a single religious-ethnic identity for its survival? You depend on a political creature that is made of both myth and bigotry and can no longer even pretend to claim a moral purpose or high ground. It is certainly no better than anything around it. If you were Chinese I would say you “lost the mandate of Heaven” if you ever really had it?

And the sheer stomach turning arrogance of your suggestion that an indigenous population make way for arrivals that they can have little or no control over invites the turn of the question on the questioner.

For over 60 years – the question has always been in the Middle East – why all the refugees of Hitler here and why was restitution not made from them in their home countries? Statesmen can show nothing but contempt for the masses they govern. They can make some of the most foolish decisions that only reveal their inadequacies decades later even when many of the smarter of them can see the problems to be anticipated at the start.

Zionism was a popular political movement in Europe for the most part.
If it meets its undoing in recent events, than what can you complain about? A mass hysteria meets and is possibly defeated by another mass hysteria. Only this one is even larger and hungrier and quite possibly smarter than the first one.

Jan 28, 2011 1:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.