Obama: drug abuse requires broader policy response

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:10pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Thursday that fighting drug abuse demanded a broad public health effort to curb demand for narcotics, but repeated his opposition to outright decriminalization.

"I am not in favor of legalization," Obama told an event hosted on the YouTube website. "I am a strong believer that we have to think more about drugs as a public health problem," he said, when quizzed by the online audience.

A long-standing push in California to legalize marijuana suffered a setback in November when voters rejected a ballot measure that would have lifted its prohibition by 54 percent to 46 percent.

The issue was highly popular among online questioners and Obama said it was "entirely legitimate" to debate if the U.S. war on drugs was working.

Citing the success of U.S. public health campaigns against cigarette smoking, drunk driving and to promote the use of car seat belts, Obama said the country had made "huge strides" over the last 30 years by targeting popular attitudes.

"On drugs, I think a lot of times we've been so focused on arrests, incarceration, interdiction, that we don't spend as much time thinking about how do we shrink demand," he said.

"In some cities, for example, it may take six months for you to get into a drug treatment program. Well, if you are trying to kick a habit and somebody says to you, come back in six months, that's pretty discouraging."

He said it was worth looking at the allocation of resources between law enforcement and health programs, but vowed not to let up on traffickers.

"We have to go after drug cartels that not only are selling drugs, but are creating havoc, for example, along the U.S.-Mexican border," he said.

U.S. efforts to stem the illegal drug trade, first called the "War on Drugs" by President Richard Nixon in 1971, rely on policies to discourage output, distribution and consumption. They involve participation of a number of foreign countries.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
tiktin wrote:
It is none of the government’s business what drugs people take. All drugs need to be legalized without a prescription. By the same token, the government has no obligation to save people from the consequences of their actions. This country was built on individual liberty and individual responsibility. The federal government has become a bloated bureaucracy which threatens to turn this country into an Orwellian nightmare if it is not stopped.

Jan 27, 2011 7:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
FactCorrector wrote:
“but repeated his opposition to outright decriminalization.”

He repeated his opposition to legalization, NOT decriminalization. They are not the same thing and this headline should be changed.

Decriminalization means that you can’t be sent to jail for having small amounts on your person, but it does not tax and regulate the sale of marijuana the same way we treat alcohol and cigarettes, which legalization would do. This is important because not only do we lose an enormous amount of tax revenue, but the product is still coming largely from the cartels and fueling violence.

Jan 27, 2011 7:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JJKay wrote:
tiktin’s right about our government being founded on personal liberty and being governed by a limited government. We need to focus on educating people about how free our country truly was when it was founded and have people understand the merits of such a society. Hopefully we can turn it around and make it worthy of the adage ‘land of the free and home of the brave’ again.

A limited government should have zero say in peoples behaviors.

Jan 27, 2011 7:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.