Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Yellowstone Park managers release 62 buffalo

Related Topics

SALMON, Idaho | Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:48pm EST

SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - Yellowstone National Park managers released 62 buffalo from a holding pen on Thursday, putting to rest animal advocates' fears the animals would be slaughtered.

The buffalo, or bison, were among dozens of the animals caught in the pen in Yellowstone in early January.

The government has the option of killing buffalo that cross park boundaries and wander into the lowlands of Montana, where they are not tolerated.

Yellowstone bison have high rates of exposure to brucellosis, a disease that causes cows to abort. Leaders of Montana's cattle industry say buffalo could infect cows.

That would cause the state to lose the brucellosis-free designation that allows it to export cattle without testing and maintain market value.

Wildlife managers seek to balance those concerns about cattle with an experiment to return some of Yellowstone's wild buffalo to historic winter grazing grounds.

Yellowstone spokesman Al Nash said the 62 bison released on Thursday were pushed south into the park in hopes they will stay put.

"Today felt like a good day," he said.

Worried the government would truck the bison to slaughterhouses, the advocacy group Buffalo Field Campaign this week stepped up phone calls and e-mails petitioning the park to set the animals free.

"We're glad they made the right decision. It's a real victory for the bison," said Dan Brister, head of Buffalo Field Campaign.

Last week, 25 brucellosis-free bison were pushed north of the park onto open land in the Gallatin National Forest in Montana.

Officials shot and killed a bison cow Monday after it resisted two days of efforts to push it back onto public lands and after government wranglers said it acted aggressive.

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Odin87 wrote:
There has NEVER been a case of bison to cattle transmission, in the wild. Now lets quit the lies and move on to the next issue. The entire scientific community does not have a clue to what causes the brucellosis at Yellowstone, so if they are moved to different locations they might not get brucellosis. The cattle industtry does not know how to build immunity in their herds so they are sick every year from some disease or another. This is where the fear comes from! If we depend on real science, and stop the fear propoganda, this problem is over in fifteen minutes and everyone can go home and clean their own nest!

Jan 28, 2011 12:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
joshalo wrote:
Again, the reporter is missing a big part of the story. The rules for brucellosis have changed. See the interim rule published in the federal register on December 27, 2010. Montana, nor any other state, will lose their brucellosis free status even if buffalo do infect cattle with brucellosis. Elk recently infected Ted Turner’s domestic bison herd in Montana and the state’s status was not impact at all. It wasn’t even really a big deal for either the state or Turner’s ranch. Call them yourself and see. No big deal. Easily managed. The livestock industry is still promoting the same lies they always have. This is not about brucellosis, it is about grass and which animals get to eat it. This is also costing taxpayers millions of dollars a year when there are alternative solutions that are far less costly and don’t require any significant management of buffalo. It would be refreshing to see some well researched journalism that is up to date with this issue.

Jan 28, 2011 9:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.