Bankers play contrite, offer olive branch at Forum

DAVOS, Switzerland Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:50am EST

France's Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry Christine Lagarde attends a session at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos January 29, 2011. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

France's Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry Christine Lagarde attends a session at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos January 29, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Christian Hartmann

Related Topics

DAVOS, Switzerland (Reuters) - Top bankers adopted a softer tone after high-level meetings at the World Economic Forum on Saturday, thanking governments for shoring up the financial system in the hope of avoiding tighter regulation.

But, in a reminder of the problems banks still face after absorbing billions of dollars of taxpayers' money in bailouts, French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde said financiers needed to show real thanks by changing their behavior.

After kicking off the debate at the Forum's annual meeting with an attack on regulation, bankers took a different tack on Saturday at a meeting with finance ministers, emphasizing their wish to help create jobs and boost growth.

"I think it was a very constructive meeting and a meeting where we recognized that a lot has changed," Barclays' Chief Executive Bob Diamond, who acted as the co-chair of the bankers this week, told a Davos panel discussion on Saturday.

"But an awful lot has changed in the last three years and we should say 'thank you' to the central banks, to the finance ministers, to the regulators because banks are operating in a safer and sounder financial system."

Lagarde, who was on the same panel, was quick to respond.

"The best way for the banking sector to say 'thank you' would be to actually have good financing of the economy, sensible compensation systems in place and reinforcement of their capital," she said to laughter and applause.

The mood in the chic Alpine village soured at the start of the forum, when Goldman Sach chief operating officer Gary Cohn accused rulemakers of pushing risk toward the unregulated financial sector by putting an excessive burden on banks.

Tension rose when JP Morgan's boss Jamie Dimon, one of the few U.S. bank bosses to survive the crisis, publicly clashed with French President Nicolas Sarkozy for putting more regulation on the agenda of the G20, which Sarkozy now chairs.

Sarkozy lashed out, telling Dimon that banks had done things which "defied common sense" and were wrong to resist more regulation. "If people present me as obsessed with regulation, it's because there is a need for regulation," he said.

But bankers opted for a more conciliatory tone when they met finance ministers, central bankers including European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet and regulators at a close-door gathering on Saturday morning that formally concluded deliberations on financial regulation.

GOOD MEETING OF MINDS

Deutsche Bank CEO Josef Ackermann said the mood at the meeting had been good and Prudential Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam, the other informal spokesman of the bankers' group, called the session "a good meeting of minds."

"I think it was more upbeat than I expected," said Howard Davies, a former chairman of the UK Financial Services Authority who also attended the meeting.

"There was no kind of sense of 'let's have an argument about over-regulation, too much capital, banks are being beaten up or whatever'. It was more 'how do we ensure coordination ?'"

Congressman Barney Frank, also present at the meeting, said that contrary to 2006, there was now a recognition among bankers that policymakers need to regulate the sector, and probably venture into the "shadow banking" system at some point.

Yet, although accepting that regulation is here to stay, bankers asked for a quick and consistent implementation of the many requirements that are being imposed on them, especially for banks that are operating across many countries.

"There is a need to rapidly end this phase of regulatory uncertainty and to know that ... there is a level playing field and that the rules are equally implemented," said Federico Ghizzoni, chief executive of Italy's biggest bank UniCredit.

(Additional reporting by Paul Carrel and Michael Stott, editing by Michael Stott and Mark Heinrich)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Greenspan2 wrote:
Goldman Sach’s spokesperson pinpointed the root of all evil when he said that regulation would push risk toward the unregulated financial sector. Unregulated finance is virtually criminal and should not be legal, and certainly should not have access to investor money as if it were on par with regulated financial institutions.

Jan 29, 2011 9:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
CrispyC wrote:
In reading this article it is obvious the banks have no intention of helping those that are in trouble over home mortgages. Obviously the only concern of the banks is how much regulation will be put on them and when. Sounds like they want to know how many more people they can stick it to before they have to stop. Also sounds like the governments have little concern for the tax payers either. All a rather nice little story for everyone so they can go home and say they did something.

Jan 29, 2011 1:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
breezinthru wrote:
Isn’t it nice that those banking arthropods thanked the central banks, the finance ministers, and the regulators?

They also owe a thank you and a sincere apology to all of the ordinary people they harmed with the assistance of the central banks, finance ministers, regulators and legislators… an apology for ruining their retirement plans, their career opportunities, their families’ security, for passing on an unimaginably large debt to the next several generations of yet unborn children.

Of course, those silk-collar ingrates never really think about ordinary citizens except in trying to figure out yet another novel way to get even richer by screwing them over again.

Jan 29, 2011 2:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.