U.S. bank regulators to consider pay rule next week

Tue Feb 1, 2011 10:53am EST

* Deferred compensation expected to be part of rule

* Large banks to pay more into deposit insurance fund

By Dave Clarke

WASHINGTON, Feb 1 (Reuters) - U.S. banking regulators will meet next week to consider a proposal that would ban bonus payments that promote "inappropriate" risk-taking by financial industry executives and employees.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp Chairman Sheila Bair has said the rule on incentive-based pay practices will probably require financial firms to defer some of their executives' compensation.

The rule is required by the Dodd-Frank reform law and was included in response to complaints that financial institutions were paying executives based on short-term profit gains and without thinking about the long-term implications for the companies and markets.

The FDIC board meets on Monday to consider the pay proposal as well as a final rule, also required by the new law, requiring large banks to pay more into the government fund used to cover the cost of seizing failed banks.

The law requires the FDIC to base the assessments it charges for its deposit insurance fund on a bank's total liabilities rather than on the amount of domestic deposits held by an institution.

Due to this change, Bank of America (BAC.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Citigroup (C.N) combined would pay about $1 billion more annually in assessments under the new liabilities-based system, according to industry estimates.

"At least from the impacts of Dodd-Frank that are measurable right now, the change in FDIC assessment is the single largest impact on us," Citigroup Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach told analysts during a Jan. 18 conference call. (Reporting by Dave Clarke, Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Nomasobama wrote:
Its too bad they aren’t going to apply this rule on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Franklin Raines made a mint on bonuses and a golden parachute based on increasing cash flow based almost entirely on leveraging up on sub-prime and alt-a mortgages. If he didn’t have that enticement he may not have leveraged up 100-1 with crap loans for the sake of financial enrichment. If that hadn’t happened, loan originators might not have had much of a market for sub-prime and alt-a mortgages, and financial crisis might not have happened at all.

Feb 01, 2011 12:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.