Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Ad banned for "simulating drug use"

Related Topics

LONDON | Wed Feb 2, 2011 12:38pm EST

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's advertising watchdog banned an Yves St Laurent perfume advert on Wednesday, which showed a woman appearing to simulate injecting drugs.

A total of 13 viewers complained about the TV commercial for the perfume "Belle D'Opium," which shows a woman dancing to a drum beat before pointing to her inner elbow and running her finger along the inside of her forearm.

The woman was then shown lying on the floor as a voice-over said: "I am your addiction. I am Belle D'Opium. The new fragrance by Yves St Laurent."

YSL said the name Belle D'Opium was meant to suggest the addictive qualities of the women who wear the fragrance rather than the addictive effects of drugs.

They said the advert had been carefully choreographed to allow Belle to seduce the viewer and display the intense and powerful qualities of the perfume.

However the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the frantic atmosphere of the shortened television version could be misinterpreted by viewers as the effects of drug use rather than an expression of femininity and bewitchment.

"We were concerned that in the context of the ad, Belle running her finger down her inner arm could be seen to simulate the injection of opiates into the body," the ASA said in its ruling.

"Following that scene, Belle was shown moving in a series of short, rapid scenes, before the ad concluded with her body seizing upwards while lying on the floor, an action we considered could be seen to simulate the effect of drugs on the body," the ASA added.

(Writing by Caroline Copley; Editing by Steve Addison)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
JosieB1989 wrote:
Drug use/ abuse is not something that should be taken lightly. Props to the ASA for recognizing that and putting a stop to the commercial.

www.drugrehabcomparison.com

Feb 02, 2011 2:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
NashvilleDave wrote:
While it’s definitely a silly ad for a product which stupidly associates itself with a highly addictive drug, here in the United States Britain sounds more and more like 1984 everyday. I can’t imagine a government agency here doing something like this. Especially not over 13 complaints.

Feb 02, 2011 3:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RMRCal wrote:
They should have called it Belle d’Aphrodisiac and had her simulating sex. I’m sure the Brits would have been o.k. with that.

Feb 02, 2011 4:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.