Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Pay gap widening between male, female doctors

Related Topics

Dr. Millie Marie Tolentino (R) examines patient Dora Leon at Clinica Sierra Vista's Central Bakersfield Community Health center in Bakersfield, California October 20, 2009. REUTERS/Phil McCarten

Dr. Millie Marie Tolentino (R) examines patient Dora Leon at Clinica Sierra Vista's Central Bakersfield Community Health center in Bakersfield, California October 20, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Phil McCarten

CHICAGO | Thu Feb 3, 2011 11:14am EST

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Newly trained female doctors in the United States make nearly $17,000 less than their male counterparts, even though women increasingly are choosing careers in higher-paying medical specialties, U.S. researchers said on Thursday.

They said there has been a widening gender gap in starting salaries for female doctors, rising from a difference of $3,600 in 1999 to $16,819 in 2008.

"It is not surprising to say that women physicians make less than male physicians because women traditionally choose lower-paying jobs in primary care fields or they choose to work fewer hours," Anthony Lo Sasso of the School of Public Health of the University of Illinois at Chicago said in a statement.

"What is surprising is that even when we account for specialty and hours and other factors, we see this growing unexplained gap in starting salary. The same gap exists for women in primary care as it does in specialty fields," said Lo Sasso, whose findings were published in the journal Health Affairs.

The study is based on survey data from more than 8,000 doctors exiting training programs in New York, a state that is home to more residency programs and resident physicians than any other in the United States.

While historically women have tended to choose primary care fields such as family medicine or pediatrics, the percentage of women entering those fields dropped from about 50 percent in 1999 to just over 30 percent in 2008, roughly on par with male doctors.

But even though women doctors are choosing higher-paying medical specialties, they still made considerably less than men in 2008. The team found the gap widened even after adjusting for choice of specialty, practice type or number of hours worked.

"Essentially, what we see is our ability to explain that difference in salary between men and women goes away. What we're left with is almost a $17,000 salary difference between men and women," Lo Sasso said in a telephone interview.

"We weren't expecting to see this widening gap in salary over time and the inability to account for it with any observable characteristics."

While the study does not show why, Lo Sasso said the team cannot rule out gender bias as an explanation. But he thought it likely that female doctors were taking less pay in exchange for regular schedules or other family-friendly benefits.

"What we think it is essentially women trading off some salary for other nonmonetary aspects of the job," he said.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
mdmd wrote:
The problem here is with averaging, not gender discrimination. Many starting female physicians earn as much or more than the “average male.” The “mystery” could be solved by doing a study which compared the billable charges the employer can make by physician employee. I expect the result would show that employers can bill about 17,000 more for the “average male” than for the “average female.” Of course, many factors such as specialty, hours worked, location, call schedule, and other things impact that metric.

Feb 03, 2011 12:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
bepa wrote:
Please give more data. What were the salaries? That data is available but you have chosen to exclude it from your report. Why is that?

Feb 03, 2011 12:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
d3v wrote:
What gives Americans the right to dictate to the rest of world about women’s rights when they don’t uphold those rights in their own country?

Feb 03, 2011 2:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.