House Republicans seek $32 billion in spending cuts

WASHINGTON Thu Feb 3, 2011 4:13pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican leaders in the House of Representatives will seek $32 billion in spending cuts this year as part of an initial bid to shrink record budget deficits forecast to hit $1.5 trillion this year alone.

Aides to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan on Thursday outlined the savings that would become part of a bill to fund a range of federal programs through the current fiscal year that ends on September 30.

The legislation is a warm-up to a much bigger fight over spending priorities -- and possibly tax policy -- that will intensify on February 14 when President Barack Obama submits his fiscal 2012 budget proposal to Congress.

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, backing up recent calls by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, urged Congress to pass legislation raising the U.S. debt limit, which will soon breach its $14.3 trillion ceiling.

Citing the possibility of "catastrophic" implications from inaction, Bernanke told the National Press Club, "I would very much urge Congress not to focus on the debt limit as being the bargaining chip" in a fight over spending and tax policy, as some Republicans have urged.

Some of Obama's fellow Democrats in Congress, as well as some Republicans, are urging Obama to host a summit to work out a long-term fix to get record budget deficits under control.

"What needs to be done is a multiyear comprehensive plan that reduces the debt on the order of $4 trillion," Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, a Democrat, told reporters.

PAINFUL CUTS

Any such fix could require painful cuts that Democrats have been resisting to retirees' Social Security and government-backed healthcare programs. It also could require tax increases that Republicans oppose.

Federal programs currently are operating on stop-gap funding that will run out on March 4. The House is aiming to pass the new spending plan the week of February 14.

The House Appropriations Committee still must fill in the details of how the spending cuts would be carried out and the Democratic-led Senate will consider its own plan, setting the stage for a bitter battle over spending and debt that some lawmakers fear could lead to a government shutdown.

Ryan's spending cuts would fall mainly on domestic programs other than domestic security protections and benefits for war veterans, according to the aides, who asked not to be identified.

While the aides said small savings would be found in some defense and national security programs proposed by Obama last year, spending in those areas would rise slightly under Ryan's plan compared to current levels.

Domestic non-security spending would fall to about $420 billion this year, from around $461 billion under current levels, his aides said.

While it will be up to the House Appropriations Committee to come up with specific spending cuts within the overall level, Ryan's aides said environmental programs had expanded in recent years and could be an example of a target for cuts.

Education, law enforcement and a range of other programs could be cut too, they said.

Democrats have countered that cutting spending too much too fast could threaten the economic recovery.

Ryan's aides said compared to Obama's budget request for fiscal year 2011, the Republican plan would save $74 billion.

In their 2010 congressional campaigns, Republicans pledged to cut $100 billion from Obama's request and to set domestic discretionary spending back to 2008 levels -- before massive government bailouts and spending measures were instituted to help rescue an economy plunging into a deep recession.

Republican leaders have said with five months of the current fiscal year already gone, it was difficult to achieve the full $100 billion in savings they had promised.

Many rank-and-file Republicans have been urging more ambitious spending cuts than Ryan produced. Once the legislation hits the House floor, they are expected to offer amendments for deeper cuts in domestic spending.

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
txgadfly wrote:
You could save that just in the airborne ordinance budget for Asia and still have plenty for the military there. Just blow up fewer houses with wedding guests and such. Might bring a little more care in target selection as a side benefit.

But … no. Reduce spending on oxygen for nursing homes instead. We must keep our priorities straight.

Feb 03, 2011 11:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
Our deficit is greater than $4 Billion per day now! $32 Billion represents a little over 1 weeks deficit cuts folks! Also, our $14+ Trillion debt represents about 25% of the entire world debt!! Anyone else think we have a moral obligation to the world market and our citizens to do better than this?? Doesn’t include the trillions in debt that are in the pipeline headed our way (unfunded entitlements, state & pension debt/deficits, etc etc)

Feb 03, 2011 12:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cleantech2011 wrote:
The Republicans already wrecked the American economy through years of mismanagement and laissez-faire financial policies that failed to address the 21st century needs of the American people and the country. With a GOP majority in the House setting the political agenda on the Hill, they are once again in charge, and hell bent on destroying a post-Bush US economic recovery that is just beginning to recover and gain momentum.

Feb 03, 2011 12:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.