Jordan Islamists demand speedy political reform

AMMAN Fri Feb 4, 2011 1:32pm EST

1 of 5. Protestors from opposition parties hold up a sign during a demonstration against Jordan's government and Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak outside the Egyptian embassy in Amman February 4, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Ali Jarekji

Related Topics

AMMAN (Reuters) - Hundreds of Jordanians, inspired by demonstrations in Egypt, protested Friday against King Abdullah's government reshuffle saying it did not meet their calls for political reform.

Protesters, drawn mainly from Jordan's powerful Muslim Brotherhood, said the hundreds of thousands of Egyptians demanding an immediate end to President Hosni Mubarak's 30-year rule were charting a road to freedom and democracy for all Arabs against autocratic rulers.

Abdullah Tuesday asked Marouf Bakhit, a conservative former premier with a military background, to head the government after accepting the resignation of Samir Rifai, whose dismissal was demanded in protests across the country.

But the appointment of Bakhit angered the main Islamist opposition as his last government oversaw 2007 local and parliamentary elections seen as marred by vote-rigging that left them with a handful of seats in a pro-government assembly.

"No to Rifai; No to Bakhit. We want an elected prime minister," chanted the mainly Islamist crowd, joined by scores of left-wing protesters and activists.

Sheikh Hamza Mansour, head of the Islamic Action Front (IAF), the political wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, said: "We want changes in policy and laws. It is not about changing faces."

But Bakhit's appointment seems to have calmed many tribal and rural Jordanians, backbone of support for the Hashemite monarchy, who have mobilized the protests in rural areas in the past weeks against what they see as cuts in state jobs and subsidies since the global financial crisis hit Jordan.

Many of them prefer Bakhit to Rifai, who spearheaded free market reforms cutting state support which they depend on.

Many protesters Friday said real change would be by having broader political representation and a more democratic parliament. The king appoints cabinets, approves legislation and can dissolve parliament.

Thursday, Abdullah met leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood during which he said the pace of political reforms in recent years had faced hurdles and pledged to fight corruption.

The Brotherhood -- an opponent of Israel, with which Jordan has a peace treaty, and the United States -- said its leaders raised long-standing demands for wider freedom and an end to laws that curb civil liberties.

"We want seriousness and reforms on the ground. We want initiatives now where people feel they are partners in decision making," Sheikh Mansour, who attended the meeting with the monarch, told protesters Friday.

(Writing by Suleiman al-Khalidi, editing by Janet Lawrence)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
burkes wrote:
Democracy ruled by a theocracy, is not freedom buy religious imprisonment. Why
throw out one dictator, just to put in another? Under the guise of freedom? Time after time, when a muslim theocracy takes over women and democracy suffers. It’s like going back to the stone ages.

This is nothing more than attempts by the muslims to control the pro-Western
countries, who have been helping to fight the Taleban. If they are successful in
overturning these Countries, the Middle East will fall to muslim extremist. And muslim rule, where women are put in their place and people under the control
of terrorist.

This is not about democracy and people are being led down a blind alley. They terrorist know they can’t beat the military might of Western armies, so they are attempting to defeat them with a broader brush stroke, by taking over countries
supporting them. This is not about democracy, but pious enslavement and the
rule of muslim laws that will send people back into the dark ages.

Feb 04, 2011 2:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
burkes wrote:
Democracy ruled by a theocracy, is not freedom but religious imprisonment. Why
throw out one dictator, just to put in another? Under the guise of freedom? Time after time, when a muslim theocracy takes over women and democracy suffers. It’s like going back to the stone ages.

This is nothing more than attempts by the muslims to control the pro-Western
countries, who have been helping to fight the Taleban. If they are successful in
overturning these Countries, the Middle East will fall to muslim extremist. And muslim rule, where women are put in their place and people under the control of terrorist.

This is not about democracy and people are being led down a blind alley. The terrorist know they can’t beat the military might of Western armies, so they are attempting to defeat them with a broader brush stroke, by taking over countries supporting them.

This is not about democracy, but pious enslavement and the rule of muslim laws that will send muslim people back into the dark ages. The real question should be, what is going to happen to Saudi and its oil wealth, when they are surrounded by muslim extremist Countries and they take over Saudi’s oil? If they succeed, the West will crumble.

Feb 04, 2011 2:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
burkes wrote:
The main impetus of this movement is the control of the oil fields by muslims and
access to nuclear weapons, to be used against pro-Western countries.

Feb 04, 2011 4:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus