BP's Feinberg must be more transparent: Mississippi

ATLANTA Fri Feb 4, 2011 11:25am EST

Kenneth Feinberg, administrator of the BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster Victim Compensation Fund, testifies before the U.S. House Small Business Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 30, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Kenneth Feinberg, administrator of the BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster Victim Compensation Fund, testifies before the U.S. House Small Business Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 30, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

ATLANTA (Reuters) - A judge's ruling will force the man who runs BP Plc's $20 billion compensation fund for victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill to be more transparent, Mississippi's attorney general said on Thursday.

The ruling by a Louisiana judge on Wednesday represents a "shot across the bow" for administrator Kenneth Feinberg and the fund should be subject to court-appointed monitors, said state Attorney General Jim Hood.

Louisiana District Judge Carl Barbier ruled that Feinberg is not independent and BP must refrain from calling him "neutral" as he dispenses compensation to victims of the Gulf of Mexico disaster, the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

In addition, BP must disclose in all communications that the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF) run by Feinberg is acting on behalf of BP in fulfilling its legal obligations under the Oil Pollution Act, Barbier said.

Feinberg's actions as fund administrator have been subject to criticism for months. When first appointed last June at the height of the spill, he made a point of telling residents at town hall meetings on the coast he was independent.

He has argued that his fund will pay sooner and more generously than federal courts, and he and BP both regularly describe him and the fund as "neutral" or "independent."

But critics on the Gulf coast pointed out that he was in fact paid by BP -- something he acknowledged -- and said the fund he administered was set up by the oil company.

"He just stepped over the bounds. He got in over his head. I like him. He's an animated fellow. (But) the courts have fired a shot across his bow and he's going to have to provide transparency," Hood said in an interview.

All the attorneys general in the states affected by the spill, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana, agree on the need for greater fund transparency, Hood said.

Specifically, Hood said he wants GCCF to release documentation to show its decision-making process and a court should appoint monitors over Feinberg, though he said he expected both BP and Feinberg to fight that request.


Feinberg should also desist from telling claimants to sign up for a final payment, especially without speaking first to a lawyer, Hood said. Under that final payment scheme, claimants would sign away rights to initiate litigation against BP.

"He continues to try to bullrush people into signing a final release," Hood said, adding that this stance could violate the Oil Pollution Act.

"I am glad the court decided to take jurisdiction over him and reel him in. He's done so much out there, telling people they don't need lawyers and all of that type of thing. It was unethical," Hood said.

In a separate statement, Alabama's attorney general said the ruling would establish some basic truths about Feinberg.

"Barbier confirmed what many Alabamians have long suspected: Ken Feinberg and the Gulf Coast Claims Facility are neither 'neutral' nor 'independent' from BP," said Luther Strange.

The fund was set up last year at the urging of the White House after millions of barrels of oil poured into the Gulf following an explosion on a BP rig. The spill damaged the fragile wetlands of Louisiana and hit fishing and tourism businesses in Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.

The fund has so far disbursed around $3.5 billion.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ponchousa wrote:
Dear Mr.Feinberg,
I know you are a very rich man. But how would you feel If a client of yours gave you the type of figures you gave for all the people of the Gulf Coast area to be paid? I really believe you would not take a 8 month year basis for you pay. I know you are a intelligent man to know 12 months are in a year. also to pay you two years for a job that was recorded in the past that will take five years to finish. You would not take the job. So please don’t insult the Gulf Coast people with this offer, even you would not take! We all know you work for BP. But that does not mean you have to degrade your intelligence or ours for them?

Feb 04, 2011 1:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
I’d make the case Louisiana needs to be more transparent!

Feb 04, 2011 3:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow