UK says Labour government aided Libya over bomber release

LONDON Mon Feb 7, 2011 2:28pm EST

Abdel Basset al-Megrahi is seen in his room at a hospital in Tripoli in this September 9, 2009 file photo. REUTERS/Ismail Zetouny

Abdel Basset al-Megrahi is seen in his room at a hospital in Tripoli in this September 9, 2009 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Ismail Zetouny

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's former Labour government tried to make it easier for Libya to seek the Lockerbie bomber's release, according to an official report published on Monday that could stoke anger in Washington.

Abdel Basset al-Megrahi was jailed for life for blowing up Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland in 1988. Scottish authorities freed him in August 2009 on compassionate grounds after concluding he had just months to live because of cancer. He is still alive

The report by Britain's senior civil servant, Gus O'Donnell, said the government decided British interests would be hurt if he died in a Scottish jail because of "the extremely high priority attached to Mr Megrahi's return by the Libyans."

The British government developed a policy to help the Libyans make an appeal to the devolved Scottish government for Megrahi to be transferred under prisoner agreements or released on compassionate grounds, the report said.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said the report showed there was no conspiracy, as some in the United States had suggested, between British oil giant BP, which has interests in Libya, the Scottish government and London to free Megrahi.

"It was a decision taken by the Scottish government, the wrong decision, but their decision nevertheless," Cameron told parliament.

Cameron, who took power after defeating Labour in an election in May and has regularly called the release a mistake, promised last year to publish documents reviewing it.

Frank Duggan, president of the Victims of Pan Am 103, a group that represents the families of U.S. victims, said he did not believe the report's conclusion.

"I think this is one more evidence of everyone pointing the finger at someone else for having made this decision," Duggan told BBC television.

U.S. senator Charles Schumer, a long-standing champion for the victims, said it "strained credulity" that the British government's position was not well known by the Scottish authorities, even if no formal pressure was applied.

"This report confirms what many of us have long suspected: the British government and BP wanted Megrahi released so that an oil deal being negotiated with Libya could go forward," Schumer said.

Megrahi was given a triumphant homecoming in Libya and is still alive nearly two years later, despite being diagnosed with terminal cancer in 2008, causing anger in the United States because 189 of the 270 victims were American.

O'Donnell's report found that there was no evidence that either the government in London or BP had applied pressure on the Scottish national authorities who ultimately decided to release Megrahi.

However, the report said Prime Minister Gordon Brown's Labour government had taken steps after Megrahi was diagnosed that made it easier for Libya to appeal for his return.

Steps taken by London included ratifying a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya, explaining to Libya how to apply for a transfer under that agreement or for compassionate release, and telling the Scottish government there was no legal barrier to a transfer.

BP and Scottish ministers have denied the oil company lobbied for Megrahi's release.

(Additional reporting by Daniel Trotta in New York)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Sinbad1 wrote:
Why did Abdel Basset al-Megrahi blow up that plane. He wasn’t a terrorist he had a good job working for airline security.
What was his motive he had none.
This whole case was what the British call a fit up, that is an innocent man is made to fit the crime. The FBI officers who found the only evidence linking this man to the bombing have been removed but the US continues to act like this guy was the perpetrator when they know he is innocent.
Meanwhile the real bombers are still at large.

Feb 07, 2011 6:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus