WikiLeaks' founder Assange fights extradition to Sweden

LONDON Mon Feb 7, 2011 1:15pm EST

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange speaks outside Belmarsh Magistrates Court, in east London February 7, 2011. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange speaks outside Belmarsh Magistrates Court, in east London February 7, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange asked a British judge on Monday to block his extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations, arguing he would not get a fair trial and could end up facing execution in the United States.

The 39-year-old Australian computer expert, who has infuriated the U.S. government by releasing thousands of secret U.S. diplomatic cables on his website, is wanted in Sweden where two WikiLeaks volunteers allege sexual misconduct last August.

His lawyers argued on the first day of a two-day extradition hearing that Assange should not be sent to Sweden because rape cases there are held in private and so Assange would be denied a fair trial.

Assange, who has been free on bail under strict conditions since December, said at the end of the day he was confident the hearing would dispel the rape allegations hanging over him.

"For the past five-and-a-half months, we have been in a condition where a black box has been applied to my life. On the outside of that black box has been written the word 'rape'. That box is now, thanks to an open court process, being opened," he told reporters massed outside the maximum-security Belmarsh magistrates' court in southeast London.

Assange's lawyer Geoffrey Robertson told the court earlier that there was a "real risk of flagrant violation of his rights" if he were sent to Sweden because most rape trials there are held behind closed doors.

"DEATH PENALTY"

In a 74-page court submission, Assange's lawyers argue there is a risk that, if he was extradited to Sweden, the United States would seek his "extradition and/or illegal rendition to the USA, where there will be a real risk of him being detained at Guantanamo Bay."

If he was sent to the United States, there was a risk he could be "made subject to the death penalty" on charges of espionage for publishing the diplomatic cables.

Prosecution lawyer Clare Montgomery said there was no proof that Assange ran the risk of being extradited to the United States and, if it did happen, Britain would have to give its consent first.

Montgomery dismissed defense arguments that Swedish prosecutors were abusing the fast-track European arrest warrant process because they only want to question Assange and have not yet decided whether to prosecute him.

Retired Swedish appeal court judge Brita Sundberg-Weitman, called as a defense expert witness, attacked Marianne Ny, the Swedish director of public prosecutions who is seeking to extradite Assange, accusing her of having a "rather biased view against men." Swedish media were hostile to Assange, she said.

A second defense witness, Goran Rudling, a 59-year-old campaigner for reform of Swedish sex crimes laws, said one of Assange's accusers, known as "Miss A," had later deleted several "tweets" she had sent on the day after Assange's alleged crime suggesting that she was happy to be in his company.

"It seemed obvious that the story told to the police and these facts just didn't go together," he said.

Grounds for refusing an extradition request are mainly limited to whether it would violate a suspect's human rights or whether the arrest warrant was drawn up correctly.

The U.S. government is examining whether criminal charges can be brought against him over the diplomatic cables.

Lawyer Gemma Lindfield, representing Swedish judicial authorities, told an earlier court hearing in London that the extradition case contained allegations of four sexual assaults by Assange against two women in Stockholm in August 2010.

(Editing by Jon Hemming)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
robert1234 wrote:
There should never be an extradition without the charge of a crime. Assange offered to testify over electronic means, or to meet with a representative in England to testify and Sweden declined. It’s a scam to hijack Assange, nothing less. England should release Assange and provide protection from kidnapping and illegal rendition by the U.S.

Feb 07, 2011 11:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
ReneeC2010 wrote:
The U.S. is only trying to shut him up because our government prefers to perform their jobs illegally, scandalously and secretly. Just look at their marriage with Monsanto. The majority in the U.S. has absolutely no clue about GMOs which have been put in our food unlabeled since 1996. And just recently research what happened to the individuals who released publically about the BP Oil Spill and how BP was to blame. One of them went straight to jail on trumped up charges and killed in prison. How convenient for the U.S. government. If you think for a second that they don’t want the same thing for Assange you must blindly believe corporate owned media and do not feel the need to open your eyes to the real world.

Feb 07, 2011 1:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
chessdog189 wrote:
Assange should face the charges against him. Send him to Sweden.
Those who fight so hard for his civil rights should not be trying to cover up a rapist. If he is not guilty as charged, then he has nothing to prove. The legal arguments about a US death penalty, Guantanamo, etc. are absolutely ridiculous.

Feb 07, 2011 2:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures