Q+A: How do I-9 audits find illegal workers in U.S.?

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES/DALLAS | Tue Feb 8, 2011 2:20am EST

LOS ANGELES/DALLAS (Reuters) - The U.S. government strategy to clamp down on illegal immigrant workers has been focused for the last two years on so-called "I-9 audits" that target employers rather than large-scale raids that net lots of employees .

Upscale burrito chain Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc told Reuters on Friday that a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) probe into its hiring practices is widening. These I-9 audits, experts say, are a wake-up call to the fast food and restaurant industry that relies heavily on immigrant labor.

Following are some questions and answers about I-9s and the auditing process.

WHAT IS A FORM I-9?

- An I-9 is an employment eligibility verification form. All U.S. employers must complete and retain an I-9 for each individual they hire in the United States, citizens and noncitizens alike. On the form, the employer must examine the employment eligibility and identity documents an employee presents to determine if the person can work legally in the country.

WHAT DO EMPLOYERS DO WITH THE FORM?

- The forms are not filed to the government. The form I-9 must be kept by the employer either for three years after the date of hire or for one year after employment is terminated, whichever is later. The form must be available for inspection or auditing by authorized U.S. government officials.

HOW DOES THE GOVERNMENT GO ABOUT SUCH AUDITS?

- A company will receive a "notice of inspection" from ICE and then its I-9s will be subject to audit and review. ICE says such inspections are not done at random and are based on leads and intelligence gathering.

HOW LONG DOES THIS TAKE AND WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES?

- The whole process can take months or even years from the notice of inspection to the closing of the case, which may or may not result in a fine.

The amount of such fines has dramatically increased according to data provided by ICE. Fines totaled just over $1 million in fiscal year 2009 and rose to nearly $7 million in 2010.

(Sources: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Reuters)

(Compiled by Ed Stoddard, editing by Mary Milliken and Cynthia Osterman)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
actnow wrote:
The Democrats have fought e-Verify and any reasonable measure to stop the work place hiring of illegal aliens for years. They clearly seek to make citizens of illegals to hi-jack our political system in a over the top attempt to create a single party welfare state. With many congressional and presidential races won by only a few percentage points, and 8% of current U.S. births from illegals, this scheme could easily overthrow citizens political sovereignty of their own nation. It’s up to citizens to get in the fight and remove politicians who oppose e-Verify and support mass amnesty visions like Senator Durbin/Schumer’s “DREAM” act.

Feb 09, 2011 11:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.