Obama budget attacks deficit, fight looming

WASHINGTON Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:26pm EST

A Senate staffer carries a copy of President Obama's proposed 2012 federal budget on Capitol Hill, February 14, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

A Senate staffer carries a copy of President Obama's proposed 2012 federal budget on Capitol Hill, February 14, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Video

Related Interactive

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Monday pledged to halve the U.S. deficit by 2013 and axe $1.1 trillion over a decade through spending cuts and tax increases in a budget he called a "downpayment" on fiscal control.

But Republicans, who accuse Obama of being a tax-and-spend Democrat, said the president had not gone far enough in curbing costs.

They aim to make the 2012 presidential election a referendum on his fiscal track record and threaten fights over a legal limit on the U.S. debt and how to fund the government in the short-term.

Obama said his plan was a balance between deficit reduction pain and investment for growth. It only provided a general guide on how to tackle entitlement outlays that include the Social Security and Medicare programs responsible for huge government spending.

"What we have done here is make a downpayment, but there is going to be more work that needs to be done and it's going to require Democrats and Republicans coming together to make it happen," he said at a school in nearby Maryland.

The budget calls for investments in areas such as high-speed rail, broadband Internet, and energy efficiency research. It makes cuts to programs that provide heating help for poor people and grants to big airports, for example.

Obama's $3.729 trillion budget proposal for fiscal 2012 shows the deficit rising to a record $1.645 trillion in fiscal 2011, then falling sharply to $1.101 trillion in 2012.

This trend would trim the deficit as a share of the U.S. economy to 3.2 percent by 2015 from 10.9 percent this year and meet a pledge Obama made to his Group of 20 partners to halve the deficit by 2013 compared to its size when he entered the White House in January, 2009.

The news was well-timed, with G20 finance ministers meeting in Paris on Friday and Saturday.

Two-thirds of the $1.1 trillion in savings come from spending cuts. The rest comes from higher revenues as U.S. growth steadily picks up pace and from tax increases. The president is seeking an additional $328 billion through a variety of measures, including ending tax breaks for big business on income earned abroad.


Standard & Poor's Chief Economist David Wyss said the budget was a "step in the right direction" but more was needed to be done in order to tackle entitlement spending.

He did not comment on the U.S. debt rating. A recent S&P report said a U.S. stable rating outlook assumes the government will "soon reveal a credible plan ... to enable the general government debt-to-GDP ratio to stabilize and then to decline." A ratings downgrade would likely push up U.S. borrowing costs.

Obama's budget for fiscal 2012 is a proposal to Congress and months of wrangling will now follow with Republicans, who control the House of Representatives and increased their seats in the Senate after November elections. They campaigned on deep cuts in federal spending.

"Congress often goes in a different direction," said Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Securities America in New York, who was also disappointed there was not more from the president on tackling entitlements.

Instead, Obama merely said he would work with Congress to overhaul the corporate tax code, and laid out broad principles for reforming Social Security that reflect long-held Democratic commitments to defend pensions for the elderly and disabled.

Senate and House budget committees must craft their own budget blueprints. If they succeed, this yields so-called "resolutions" providing guidance for other congressional committees to write legislation via a number of separate funding bills that can be voted into law.


Success in not assured. Obama's 2011 budget became mired in bipartisan politics when Democrats and Republicans could not agree, forcing lawmakers to resort to a stop-gap legal measure to keep funding the government which expires on March 4.

Failure to agree to a new funding bill could result in the government shutting down. That would replay a 1995-1996 showdown between a Democratic president and a Republican-led House of Representatives. The public sided with President Bill Clinton, who won re-election.

Republicans, who have already unveiled much tougher proposals to rein in rising U.S. debt, were not impressed.

"The president's budget isn't winning the future, it's spending the future," said House Speaker John Boehner, in a play on one of the White House's favorite slogans.

U.S. debt will be hit a legal limit of $14.3 trillion by the end of May unless lawmakers act to lift that ceiling.

The budget shows the deficit steadying around 3 percent of gross domestic product from 2015 onward, slowing the rate at which the U.S. adds to its debt, although it will still climb to 77 percent of GDP by 2021, up from 72 percent in 2011.

Obama plans to freeze non-security discretionary spending for five years, lowering the deficit by $400 billion over 10 years and saving $33 billion in fiscal 2012.

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle, Caren Bohan, Ross Colvin, Matt Spetalnick, David Morgan, Roberta Rampton, Glenn Sommerville, Melissa Bland, Walter Brandimarte and Emily Kaiser, Editing by Sandra Maler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (58)
RetiredOldMan wrote:
What the headline should read is “Deficit this year will be $1.6 Trillion and new budget will have less than $1.1 Trillion reduced ($110 Billion per year) over the next 10 years. We will go from right now having a $14 Trillion deficit to having a $21 Trillion deficit in about 5 to 7 years. Lets not slant the news just for people that read the headlines. We can not afford these years straight of >$1 Trillion deficits.There are lots of ways to cut the budget and do less harm to the American people. Yes some people will be effected (I am one of them), but our country has to get back on the correct track for generations to come or we will end up like a “Third Country” or one of the nations overseas that now have to cut their budgets while hurting the people there the most.

Feb 14, 2011 8:58am EST  --  Report as abuse
Fishrl wrote:
Obama can cut 10 times that much and the Republicans won’t be happy with it. It’s going to be a game of chicken culminating in a government shutdown, maybe a debt ceiling hit, maybe even a default. It’s too bad there’s no way to hold recall elections on the House of Representatives. It’s going to be a long, long, two years.

Feb 14, 2011 9:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
Darygon wrote:
How can the Republicans complain about not enough cuts to the spenditure…wasn’t it the Republicans that got the U.S into the current financial situation????? Obama is cleaning up the mess Bush left behind so the Republicans and their propaganda machines should back off.

Feb 14, 2011 9:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.