Florida's Scott takes businessman's ax to budget

MIAMI Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:57pm EST

Republican Rick Scott waves to the crowd near the end of his victory rally in Ft Lauderdale, Florida, November 3, 2010. REUTERS/Andrew Innerarity

Republican Rick Scott waves to the crowd near the end of his victory rally in Ft Lauderdale, Florida, November 3, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Innerarity

Related Video

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

MIAMI (Reuters) - Many newly elected Republican governors have pledged to run their states like a business as they grapple with low revenues and multibillion-dollar budget gaps with little relief from a fragile U.S. economic recovery.

But since they took office last month, few have gone as far in advancing campaign promises for less government and lower taxes than Florida's Tea Party-backed Governor Rick Scott.

A political newcomer, with a controversial past as chief executive of a healthcare corporation that paid a record $1.7 billion in fines for defrauding Medicare and other federal programs, Scott has taken to the job of running the fourth-largest U.S. state like a hostile takeover.

An uncompromising conservative, Scott unveiled his first budget last week at a rally attended by about 1,000 Tea Party activists in a Baptist church hall in Eustis, a town some 200 miles outside the state capital Tallahassee, where the state legislature will have to approve his proposed budget.

"Governor Scott said he wanted to present the most conservative budget in the nation," said Alan Stonecipher of the nonprofit Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy.

"It certainly appears to be hugely pro-business which was his stated intention," Stonecipher added. "I would say Florida is right in the mix, or maybe leading the nation, in a movement to, in effect, eviscerate government."

Even by the standards of a state renowned for political scandals and shenanigans, 58-year-old Scott, who has emphasized that he was never charged with any crimes as CEO of the giant Columbia/HCA hospital chain, has raised eyebrows.

His declared intention to cut regulations and taxes, and a 'slash-and-burn' approach to putting Florida's financial house in order with little apparent regard for real-world implications, have prompted warnings of dire consequences.

There may be backlash against Republicans in a presidential battleground state as the new governor, who has never served in elected office before, takes budget-slashing to new heights.


The carefully orchestrated budget presentation cast Scott, who beat his Democratic rival by a single percentage point after spending $73 million of his personal fortune on his own campaign, in the role of a Tea Party man of the people.

But he also ranks among the most unpopular newly elected governors in U.S. history, with a favorability rating of just 28 percent, according to a recent Quinnipiac University poll.

Critics cited his budget proposals -- deep cuts in state spending on education and healthcare to close a deficit of nearly $4 billion, while slashing corporate income and property taxes -- as signaling a disconnect between fiscal conservatives and ordinary Americans reeling from unemployment and the loss of homes and benefits in the recent recession.

"Retreaded voodoo economics," Florida Senate Democratic leader Nan Rich said of Scott's budget plan, referring to the trickle-down economic theory popularized under President Ronald Reagan. "The tentacles of this budget will reach the most vulnerable people in our state," Rich told Reuters.

She said the real trickle-down effect would add to the pain of most Floridians while leaving open many tax loopholes in a state that is home to some of the Republican's richest patrons.

Florida is not alone in contemplating large spending cuts to offset revenues only slowly recovering from recession and the winding down of $150 billion of federal assistance to states from the economic stimulus program of 2009.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, nearly all states are considering spending less in fiscal 2012 than in 2008. That was the last year before recession devastated revenues.

The nonpartisan center has warned that reduced spending on education, healthcare and other important services will delay the U.S. recovery and undermine efforts to create jobs, especially in states where new Republican governors like Scott are pushing for corporate tax cuts.

Illinois, where Democratic Governor Pat Quinn successfully pushed a hefty income tax increase to ease a $15 billion budget deficit through the legislature last month, is a rare exception to a national trend toward flat or lower taxes as the best tool to lure investment to recession-hit states.


Florida is less distressed than Illinois and some other states, where the fiscal crisis has roiled the traditionally stable $2.8 trillion municipal bond market and spurred proposals by some U.S. lawmakers to consider allowing states to declare bankruptcy.

But the Sunshine State is an epicenter for the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the mortgage crisis. It is also has a record 12 percent unemployment rate, the third highest in the country after Nevada and California.

Scott's budget includes a call to cut the state work force by nearly 9,000 jobs and it would require state workers, who have not had a general pay raise in five years, to contribute 5 percent of their salaries to their pensions.

His budget, apart from a vague promise of attracting business investment, appears to hold out little immediate hope for job creation. And he has proposed shifting more of the cost businesses pay for jobless benefits onto Florida taxpayers.

Such controversial proposals have been welcomed by business groups and by his Tea Party supporters.

Tom Gaitens, Florida state director of FreedomWorks, a libertarian group, which works closely with Tea Party activists and is headed by ex- U.S. House of Representatives Republican leader Dick Armey, said he was "very proud" of Scott.

"Even if you don't agree with him, you have to give the guy credit for making hard decisions," Gaitens said. "As a businessman, not as a politician, he understands that the capital that fuels the economy has to be left in the people's hands, not in the government's," he said.

But Scott's initiatives drew sharp criticism elsewhere.

"I'm very disappointed to have these tax cuts put money into well-to-do corporate pockets and abandon the needs of our most fragile and dependent citizens," said Pouria "Paul" Bidhendi, 37, the owner of two businesses, including a job recruiting and staffing company, in Orlando.

"He comes across as this super rich guy talking down to poor people," said John Faherty, 49, an event management consultant. "He's like an alien trying to talk to us."

Gaitens said the Tea Party probably has less than 200,000 active members across the state, but has punched well above its weight. This was reflected in media coverage of personalities like Florida's new U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, a Tea Party-affiliated Cuban-American who is considered a rising star of the Republican Party.

The rank-and-file Tea Partiers' obsession with government spending and deficits also runs counter to recent polls such as a Gallup survey showing that most Americans see joblessness as the country's leading cause of concern by far.

But the Tea Party and its rich supporters are in lockstep with big business in using the fiscal crisis to try to weaken organized labor, analysts say.

"That's the great hope of the far right conservatives. They're seizing the moment of fiscal crisis to either destroy or cripple the labor movement," said Harley Shaiken, a labor expert at the University of California at Berkeley.

(Additional reporting by Barbara Liston in Orlando, Michael Peltier in Eustis, Jeff Mayers in Madison, Wisconsin, and Lisa Lambert in Washington; Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (33)
McBob08 wrote:
Failed policies from a pre-failed politician. The government is not a business, and it will not succeed if you treat it like a business. Plus, you need to increase taxes for business, instead of cutting them. That’s your state’s income. You don’t free up money by cutting essential services for the most vulnerable of your citizens.

In these days of people staging huge demonstration to oppose autocrats, this Teabagger is just begging to make Florida another Egypt.

Feb 15, 2011 2:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
GRRR wrote:
We should not try to get in the way of the great political experiment that the nation – as a whole – but specifically Floridians decided to allow. We should let Tea Party supporting Republicans cut taxes and slash spending at the same time, so that everyone of us can see the results of their actions.

If Florida goes bankrupt, so be it. If riots occur, so be it. If political turmoil befalls Florida, so be it. If Florida booms, then great. If Florida leads the nation in GDP, then wonderful. But we’ll never end this voodoo economics debate if a state isn’t allowed to triumph or fail, either way.

And to be fair, no federal government intervention will be allowed to prevent Florida (or any other state that chose to follow suit, such as Texas) from failing. To do so would be ironic and hypocritical, to say the least, and Tea Party supporters would be risking economic moral hazard by accepting bail outs anyway.

Feb 15, 2011 5:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
TerryinNevada wrote:
I agree with GRRR’s comment. The way out of our mess is to BOTH cut spending and lower taxes. Unfortunately, we are in such a hole that will be difficult but Florida is trying. Many federal expenses should be eliminated and the money sent back to the States (or left IN the States by lowering taxes!). Closing the federal Department of Education is an example which sounds horrific but should be done. Education will and always has been ultimately paid for by the taxpayers so the fewer hands on the money before it gets to the kids, the better. The EPA is another example of a job better done by States. Look how much resistance EPA had when California wanted to do a better job on emissions. Transportation? The feds aren’t fixing the highway system any more, it seems so lets tax gasoline a dime or two and give the money immediately back to the States to use for road repair. The higher cost of fuel will push people to go for higher milage cars and reduce our need of foreign oil.

Feb 15, 2011 7:32am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.