Google woos publishers with One Pass payment service
SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK |
SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Google Inc launched a service to make it easy for publishers to sell digital versions of newspapers and magazines, undercutting a similar plan launched by Apple Inc, as both tech titans battle to dominate smartphones and tablet computers.
Google announced in a blog post on Wednesday its plan to woo newspapers and magazines, a day after Apple rolled out a subscription platform for digital media sold through its iTunes app store.
Google said its new service, dubbed One Pass, allows publishers to sell content that consumers can view on websites as well as in specialized apps designed for smartphones and tablet PCs. Publishers can charge for content in a variety of ways, including subscriptions, metered access and sales of single articles.
Google is letting publishers keep about 90 percent of subscription revenue gained through One Pass and is passing along some customer data.
"Our intention is to make no money on it," said Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt at an event in Berlin. "We want the publishers to make all the money."
Google's service also lets publishers provide existing print subscribers with free or discounted access to digital content, Google said.
Newspaper and magazine publishers are looking to reap revenue from online and digital editions in the hopes of reviving declining readership and advertising revenue.
"All of the sudden the entire news industry is saying we need digital subscription money and we need it now," said Ken Doctor, a media analyst with Outsell Research.
Consumers must use the company's payment system, Google Checkout, in order to use One Pass.
On Tuesday, Apple introduced a long-awaited subscription plan for magazines, newspapers, videos, music and books that provide digital content in specialized apps for iPad and iPhone users.
The service allows Apple to keep 30 percent of customer payments to any publisher with a presence in its App Store. Apple also lets consumers decide how much personal data to supply publishers when they sign up for subscriptions. Analysts have said Apple's new plan risks angering content developers.
"It's shortsighted," Forrester analyst James McQuivey wrote in a blog post. "Apple has given every publisher, producer, and distributor in the business a reason to actively pursue alternatives to the elegant apps that Apple had hitherto taught us to depend on."
One sticking point with publishers on Apple's subscription plan involves customer data. Publishers are particularly protective of subscriber data such as names, addresses and credit cards because it helps them court advertisers and market new products to existing readers.
Google said it will share a customer's name, zip code and email address with the publishers though consumers have the option not to share that information, said Google spokeswoman Jeannie Hornung.
"We do not share credit card and payment information," Hornung said.
Google's partners include the German-based media company Axel Springer AG and U.S.-based newspaper companies Media General and Rust Communications. One Pass is currently available for publishers in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Britain and the United States.
(Reporting by Alexei Oreskovic in San Francisco and Jennifer Saba in New York; Additional reporting by Eric Kelsey in Berlin; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Steve Orlofsky and Richard Chang)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
I am happy to pay for good media content, and I often do pay — that is why the various iOS devices in my family’s home are in almost constant use.
Google is an Advertising company. It gives everything for free because it increases the users on the internet, thus increasing clicks on ads, thus increasing their revenue. The whole digital media thing for free is not Google’s fault. Publishers have been giving their information for free on websites since dawn of the internet, hoping ad revenue would make up for loss of physical media sales. It didn’t work and they are trying to sell you something you can already get for free online. It works for apple because all of the iOS devices have mobile webbrowsers which can’t get the “full experience” so companies can repackage their information into “digital magazines” and sell it to you. On Android we have flash and can simply visit the desktop page. What incentive is there to subscribe?
As for “Paying for good media content” that is just what apple trained you to do. You have been conditioned to accept paying for access to their walled garden. The App store teaches you that to add stuff to your phone there is a 99c minimum for good content. The most popular Android apps are either free with ad support(and have made good revenue) or Open Source and found on the web(outside the market). Paying for “good content” when there is something better available for free is nothing to be proud of.



Follow Reuters