Baghdad wants U.S. to pay $1 billion for damage to city

BAGHDAD Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:44am EST

An Iraqi soldier stands guard as he looks at a damaged concrete wall after a bomb attack in Baghdad March 23, 2010. REUTERS/Saad Shalash

An Iraqi soldier stands guard as he looks at a damaged concrete wall after a bomb attack in Baghdad March 23, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Saad Shalash

Related Topics

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's capital wants the United States to apologize and pay $1 billion for the damage done to the city not by bombs but by blast walls and Humvees since the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

The city's government issued its demands in a statement on Wednesday that said Baghdad's infrastructure and aesthetics have been seriously damaged by the American military.

"The U.S. forces changed this beautiful city to a camp in an ugly and destructive way, which reflected deliberate ignorance and carelessness about the simplest forms of public taste," the statement said.

"Due to the huge damage, leading to a loss the Baghdad municipality cannot afford...we demand the American side apologize to Baghdad's people and pay back these expenses."

The statement made no mention of damage caused by bombing.

Baghdad's neighborhoods have been sealed off by miles of concrete blast walls, transforming the city into a tangled maze that contributes to massive traffic jams. Despite a sharp reduction in overall violence in recent years only 5 percent of the walls have been removed, officials said.

The heavy blast walls have damaged sewer and water systems, pavement and parks, said Hakeem Abdul Zahra, the city spokesman.

U.S. military Humvees, driven on street medians and through gardens, have also caused major damage, he said.

"The city of Baghdad feels these violations, which have taken place for years, have caused economic and moral damage," he said.

U.S. troops pulled out of Iraq's cities in June 2009 before formally ending combat operations last August. Around 50,000 remain in Iraq but they are scheduled to withdraw by year end.

Baghdad is badly in need of a facelift. Electricity and trash collection are sporadic, streets are potholed and sewage treatment plants and pipes have not been renovated for years.

Iraq has seen growing protests in recent weeks over poor government services.

Zahra said the city's statement issued on Wednesday would be the start of its measures to get the United States to pay for damages but he did not say what other steps might be taken.

(Reporting and writing by Aseel Kami; Editing by Jim Loney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (144)
PDenoli wrote:
That seems like a reasonable request. Let’s deduct that billion in fines from the debt owed for liberating them from a dictator they allegedly despised. After that adjustment, let’s say the city of Baghdad only owes us 199 billion, and we should allow them to pay in installments.

Feb 17, 2011 10:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
FLirishPM1959 wrote:
Let me guess…that $1 billion will somehow make it into the bank account of Maliki and some of the other islamic “leaders” in the Iraqi government. This guy certainly has looked at the example set by the moocher class here in America who only want “what’s coming to them” off the backs of the productive taxpayer. Nothing like a little “redistribution” of wealth because after all, as Barry said, “at some point, you’ve made enough money”……

Feb 17, 2011 10:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
Jack49 wrote:
I would think that we can agree that we owe the city of Bagdad one billion dollars for repairs. We’ll just take that off their bill of $500 billion for the new infrastructure that we GAVE them and for ridding them of an evil dictator. That means they only owe us 499 billion dollars.

Feb 17, 2011 10:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus