Chances of closing Guantanamo jail very low: Gates

WASHINGTON Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:10pm EST

1 of 2. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates listens to remarks at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the 'Defense Authorization Request for FY2012' on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 17, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday that prospects for closing the Guantanamo Bay detention camp were "very, very low" given broad opposition in Congress.

President Barack Obama has so far not been able to meet his promise to close Guantanamo, but the White House said this week he remained committed to doing so. The facility has drawn international condemnation for the treatment of detainees.

Gates, testifying to the Senate, saw little hope for any breakthrough with Congress, which approved a bill that Obama signed into law last month barring terrorism suspects at Guantanamo from being brought to the United States for trial.

"The prospects for closing Guantanamo as best I can tell are very, very low given very broad opposition to doing that here in the Congress," Gates told a Senate hearing.

Obama is believed to be in the final stages of reviewing U.S. detention policy. He said in a May 2009 speech that there was a need for "prolonged detention" for some terrorism suspects who could not be tried but posed a threat to security.

In Washington on Wednesday, CIA Director Leon Panetta told senators that al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden likely would be sent to the Guantanamo prison if he were ever captured.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart; editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
LarryinParker wrote:
The Administration slowly comes to realize and accept what President George Bush knew instinctively.

Feb 17, 2011 11:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
Which would be what?

Feb 17, 2011 11:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
LarryinParker wrote:
There are very good reasons for holding terrorists at that location which cannot be rationalized away by opponents.

Feb 17, 2011 12:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.