Wealth and Investing Center

U.S. confidence on healthcare spending rises: poll

A patient waits in the hallway for a room to open up in the emergency room at Ben Taub General Hospital in Houston, Texas, July 27, 2009. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

A patient waits in the hallway for a room to open up in the emergency room at Ben Taub General Hospital in Houston, Texas, July 27, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi

NEW YORK | Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:20pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Americans are more optimistic about their ability to pay for healthcare services in the coming months, particularly for elective surgeries, according to a survey issued on Thursday.

That attitude could translate into an improvement for healthcare providers and medical companies after U.S. consumers cut back on health services in recent years because of the recession.

Companies from health insurers to medical device makers have assumed that patients will head back to the doctor's office in a significant way this year, but there has been scant evidence of that so far.

According to the Thomson Reuters Consumer Healthcare Sentiment Index, Americans were more confident they could afford healthcare in the next three months after reporting greater difficulty handling medical bills in the past three months.

"There seems to be a return to perhaps cautious optimism about the next three months," said Julie Shook, product director for the Healthcare & Science business at Thomson Reuters. "They are predicting a significant improvement in their ability to pay for and access healthcare services."

The Thomson Reuters Pulse Healthcare Survey polls more than 100,000 U.S. households annually on healthcare behaviors. The Consumer Healthcare Sentiment Index is based on responses from a survey subset of 3,000 respondents each month.

(For full report click: link.reuters.com/syb28r )

The index was launched in December 2009 with a baseline measure of 100. It fell to a low of 95 in July 2010, but regained ground to 98 in January 2011.

The component of the index that asks whether people are more optimistic about their ability to pay for healthcare in the future rose 3 percent in January compared to its level in December.

Shook pointed to elective surgeries -- which can include procedures that are medically needed but not urgent -- as an area Americans appear more sure they will not delay or cancel.

"Throughout 2010, elective surgery was the thing they were most likely to say they would delay or cancel," Shook said. "That apparently has turned around."

Conversely, Americans appear most likely to delay or not fill prescriptions in the months ahead, according to survey responses.

In the January results, respondents said that in the prior three months they had reached a high in difficulty in paying for healthcare, possibly as they focused spending on shopping for year-end holidays, Shook said.

"The three months just completed we had an all-time high in difficulty and that resulted primarily in them postponing or delaying filling, or not filling, prescriptions," Shook said.

(Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
ladyjade01 wrote:
I wonder who they found to interview? Nancy Pelosi? Bill Gates? Harry Reid? They didn’t ask me or my co-workers. Our employer provided health care is at the point, we put off going to the doctor, because the medications we need have co-payments that bust our budgets. Drugs that last year cost us $25 to $75 are now so high, that we have to choose between bringing a lunch to work or getting the needed medication. Our drug coverage does not cover what the doctors write on the prescription. I, personally, have one drug, that is a generic, that the doctor wrote for 1 pill 2 times a day. The insurance will only pay for one pill a day. The other pill must come out of my pocket. This is in addition to the co-pay on the first pill of the day. I blame this reduction in coverage to bummercare. False promise that those with employer provided insurance will be able to keep it. How many of those that were surveyed on this poll, were union or rich? I put off going to the doctor until I have no choice. I can no longer afford my asthma medication or inhalers, so I take a risk of death each day. I don’t know how much longer I will be able to afford my blood pressure medication. My doctors give the samples they get to their Medicare/Medicaid patients, there is none left for those with insurance. I pay for my employer provided insurance, but I can’t afford to go to the doctor, emergency room, or hospital. The next time I get really sick, I will just have to stay at home and hope that I can get over it with aspirin.

Feb 17, 2011 11:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
NobleKin wrote:
Ladyjade01:

Interesting how you would assign a private enterprise exploitation of a system Big Insurance and Big Pharma still control on Obama and the Left.

The healthcare crisis in America was long ago identified as one of the top threats to our economy…and disposable/discretionary income for the average American. No extra income = economic decline.

This threat has existed and has been perpetuated by the private system that extracts every possible dollar in the name of profit, not efficiency. The problem existed under Reagan & HW Bush, was highlighted under Clinton, and brushed aside by W…in spite of the looming reality.

Your healthcare premiums are precisely where they are because of the private system. ‘Obamacare’ as the Right Wing Death panel experts like to say, is the problem, but reality is far from this lie.

As big insurance has become less affordable, and as the rules were rigged in favor of insurance to drop the sick at will or not extend coverage to pre-existing conditions (gaming the system for profit not efficiency)…more Americans continue dropping coverage and using Medicare or Medicaid as the only affordable source for care, premiums for the rest of us will continue to rise so that big insurance can continue to ensure the share holders and executives will continue to grow fat on their enterprise AND we will need to find more tax revenue to cover the rest who cannot afford the private system…we are getting it both ways, as has been the case for a very long time.

A system that privatizes profit, and socializes the risk is not sustainable.

Whether we pay huge sums to the private system to socialize the risk, or pay into a government program to socialize the risk, the RISK is SOCIALIZED. I’d rather pay more in tax, like the majority of the industrialized world, and not fear bankruptcy at the hands of insurance or medical profiteers of the kind we know today.

Feb 17, 2011 2:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
bwilly321 wrote:
ladyjade01, your initial comments seem to be slamming the Dems for trying to lower our health costs. Most people agree the law is flawed, but I believe those flaws are there to appease Republican senators or representatives as a way to get them to vote for this measure. The conservative Dems are probably also to blame but not to the same extent as the Republicans.

Feb 18, 2011 10:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.