Chesapeake quarterly profit, revenue short of Street

HOUSTON Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:09pm EST

A man walks past the head office of BHP Billiton in central Melbourne October 18, 2010. REUTERS/Mick Tsikas

A man walks past the head office of BHP Billiton in central Melbourne October 18, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mick Tsikas

Related Video

Related Topics

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Chesapeake Energy (CHK.N) reported a fourth-quarter profit compared with a year-ago loss, but revenue came in short of analysts' expectations and the U.S. oil and gas company's stock fell after a session of big gains.

Chesapeake -- which has pledged to reduce its debt and increase its oil production over the next two years -- reported revenue that missed Wall Street estimates as the prices it realized for oil and gas were lower than a year ago.

The company's shares, which climbed as much as 8 percent during regular trading on news of a big asset sale to Australia's BHP Billiton (BHP.AX), fell 1 percent post market.

Chesapeake, the second largest producer of natural gas in the United States behind Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N), earned $180 million, or 28 cents per share, compared with a loss of $530 million, or 84 cents, a year earlier.

Adjusted income, which excludes certain items, was 70 cents a share, Chesapeake said on Tuesday. Revenue fell 11 percent to $2 billion.

Analysts on average had expected a profit of 63 cents per share and revenue of $2.37 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S

Average daily production rose 12 percent from a year ago to 2.92 billion cubic feet equivalent. Chesapeake, based in Oklahoma City, said its proved natural gas reserves rose 20 percent last year to 17.1 trillion cubic feet equivalent.

Shares of Chesapeake fell to $31.80, after closing at $32.01 on the New York Stock Exchange.

(Reporting by Anna Driver in Houston; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
kc10man wrote:
You know who is “fraking” stupid, the fraking poor people in Arkansas who keep voting for the same fraking republican leaders who don’t give a fraking rats ass about them. Congradulations on all of you fraking idiots getting fraking canser over the next few years. Then maybe you will wish there was some sort of fraking health care plan you could fraking afford.

Feb 22, 2011 12:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
randydutton wrote:
St. Helens Energy is a subsidiary of Comet, another Australian company, that is poised to develop the natural gas field of western Washington State. Seems US companies aren’t nearly as interested.

Feb 22, 2011 12:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.