Obama says U.S. readying full range of options on Libya

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:50pm EST

1 of 2. President Barack Obama speaks about Libya as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton listens in the White House in Washington February 23, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Wednesday said the violent crackdown in Libya violated international norms and that he had ordered his national security team to prepare the full range of options for dealing with the crisis.

"It is imperative that the nations and peoples of the world speak with one voice," Obama told reporters in his first public comments on the turmoil in Libya, where leader Muammar Gaddafi is facing a revolt against his 41-year rule.

Obama urged an end to attacks on peaceful protesters but stopped short of calling for Gaddafi to step down as ruler of the oil-producing North African nation and did not lay out ay specific measures under consideration against the Libyan government.

"The suffering and bloodshed is outrageous and it is unacceptable," Obama said at the White House with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at his side. "These actions violate international norms and every standard of common decency. This violence must stop."

Obama said Washington was coordinating further steps with allies and the international community. "I have also asked my administration to prepare the full range of options that we may have to respond to this crisis," he said.

Obama has faced criticism in some quarters for not speaking out sooner, but U.S. officials say they have tempered their response to ensure Americans in Libya were safely evacuated and out of harm's way.

The Obama administration said earlier that it was looking at imposing sanctions on Libya to punish it for a violent crackdown on protesters seeking Gaddafi's ouster.

The State Department said freezing Libyan assets, including those belonging to Gaddafi, were among the options being considered, and some U.S. lawmakers have urge direct action such as imposing no-fly zones.

But U.S. options to influence events in Libya are limited, unlike in Egypt and Bahrain where Washington was able to bring pressure to bear as a long-time ally and benefactor.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
txgadfly wrote:
The USA has never been able to disengage with any Middle Eastern conflict. War without end is the monotonous result of everything we do in the region and the American people are sick of it. How can we afford to put up a “no fly” zone over Libya when we cannot “afford” to keep our promises to our seniors, our children, our disabled?

Feb 23, 2011 5:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
H2Oparkdude wrote:
The time is ripe for changing, there’s a growing feeling that taking a chance on a new kind of vision is due. I used to trust that only america’s way was right. but now Ive seen the payoffs, everywhere you look, who do you trust when everyone’s a crook?

Feb 23, 2011 6:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Publius1791 wrote:
It’s now very difficult for us to play the human rights card regarding Lybia given our track record in the Middle East.

“These actions violate international norms and every standard of common decency. This violence must stop.” Couldn’t Obama’s very same comment be attributed to U.S. supported, Israeli policy toward the Palestinians livnig in the West Bank and in Gaza?

We won’t support the international community when it calls for civil treatment of people who live in the above mentioned areas, nor will we support U.N. sactions brought against Israel for expanding settlements into restricted territories.

We can’t have it both ways. The world sees what we do, not what we say, as the true barometer of our sincerity. What message have our policies in the Middle East been sending the world regarding democracy?

Let’s hope that Mr. Obama gets this one right and only acts as part of a coalition of nations that has Lybian democracy as its goal.

Feb 23, 2011 6:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.