NYC outdoor smoking extinguished from May 23

Related Topics

Traders smoke cigarettes outside the New York Stock Exchange April 5, 2010. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Traders smoke cigarettes outside the New York Stock Exchange April 5, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK | Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:21pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Smoking in New York City's parks, beaches, boardwalks, pedestrian plazas and other public spaces will be banned from May 23 despite complaints about excessive meddling by government in people's private lives.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed the legislation on Tuesday after the city council voted 36 to 12 in favor of the smoking restrictions earlier this month. The law extends the city's existing ban on smoking in restaurants and bars.

"Frederick Law Olmsted hailed public parks as the 'lungs of the city' - a haven where one could escape the overcrowded, noisy and polluted streets," Bloomberg said in a statement. "We need to ensure that our public spaces provide just that - a healthy place in which to relax and enjoy the surroundings."

New York joins Chicago and San Francisco with initiatives fighting second-hand smoke in public places.

New York City's parks department will enforce the ban, which said it would give a warning before issuing a $50 fine. Police will not enforce the ban.

"This is tyranny, rationalized by a lie," said Audrey Silk, director of New York Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment. "That second hand smoke is harming anybody outside is an absolute lie."

She said that her organization plans to organize an outdoor "smoke-in" on May 23.

Bloomberg has also promoted health measures including a ban on trans fats in restaurant food and a requirement that chain restaurants display calorie counts on menus.

Bloomberg is campaigning nationally for food companies to cut salt levels in their products and for the federal government to ban the purchase of sugary drinks with food stamps - federal vouchers used by 42 million low-income Americans to buy food.

New Yorkers can smoke on sidewalks, parking lots, streets and in their homes, although most landlords don't allow it.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
jrj90620 wrote:
If they really want to reduce pollution they should ban internal combustion vehicles or at least put a .50/gallon pollution tax on them,to pay for incentives encouraging cleaner alternatives.Indoor public place smoking bans can make sense but I think it’s really hypocritical to ban smoking outdoors while cars and trucks are producing infinitely more pollution and are not prohibited.

Feb 23, 2011 12:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
forteinjeff wrote:
Here a city with millions is worried about a cigarette. I’m sure that’s going to make all the difference in the world as far as the quality of air. While I’m a firm believer in being considerate of others when I do light up, I think these new laws are simply goofy. 20% of the nation still smokes out of enjoyment. Guess I’ll find another city that wants my tourism money. There still has to be somewhere in this nation where a person can have a smoke without paying a $50 fine. Is NYC really that great in the first place? I wish the mayor had found time to address some of the real problems such as homelessness and the filth that literally covers every surface except for those few privileged areas such as Manhattan.

Feb 23, 2011 1:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
z0rr0 wrote:
“New York City’s parks department will enforce the ban, which said it would give a warning before issuing a $50 fine. Police will not enforce the ban”

And how many Smoke Rangers will the Mayor add to the City’s payroll? One for every fired teacher?

Only God can save lives, and He is not inclined to do so!

Feb 23, 2011 2:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.