Wisconsin governor gets ovation from business group

Related Topics

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker pauses for a moment before he takes his seat in the governor conference room at the State Capital to give a fireside chat in Madison February 22, 2011. Walker gave the chat to explain his budget repair bill which has gotten so much attention. REUTERS/ Tom Lynn/ Pool

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker pauses for a moment before he takes his seat in the governor conference room at the State Capital to give a fireside chat in Madison February 22, 2011. Walker gave the chat to explain his budget repair bill which has gotten so much attention.

Credit: Reuters/ Tom Lynn/ Pool

MADISON, Wisconsin | Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:14pm EST

MADISON, Wisconsin (Reuters) - The new Republican governor of Wisconsin drew standing ovations on Wednesday when he addressed a meeting of one of the state's largest business groups just two blocks from the Capitol building.

In a defiant 20-minute speech interrupted several times by ovations, Governor Scott Walker told the Wisconsin Manufacturing and Commerce trade group that his proposed budget repair bill, which has drawn tens of thousands of protesters here, was about more than just balancing the state's next two-year budget.

"This battle is about our commitment to the future," Walker said. "A commitment so that my children and your children and children all across this state aren't saddled with the burden of excessive debt and out-of-control spending that this past generation just passed on to today's generation."

During the speech, which drew no protesters, Walker said his bill's most controversial section, which would curb collective bargaining by public workers, was needed to provide certainty for the state's future finances.

He also suggested his proposal would help state workers offset the higher health and pension costs he wants them to pay by allowing them to stop having their union dues deducted from their pay.

"What we're asking for is very reasonable," he said. "Pay a little bit more for health and a little bit more for pensions.

"But in return, we give them the true freedom of choice ... to decide whether or not they want those union dues automatically deducted from their payroll, which in many cases is up to a $1,000 a year, that instead they can keep in their pockets."

Labor groups say Walker's measure is union-busting cloaked in a budget measure. The higher health care and pension costs would cut the average worker's annual take-home pay by thousands of dollars, they said.

Walker said the fight was not between his administration and state workers, but between his administration and labor leaders, many of them from outside the state.

"This is a battle with the big unions ... who are trying to come in and dominate this debate from out of this state because it's not about their workers money it's about their money," Walker said.

"The tens of thousands of protesters -- at least those from Wisconsin -- who have been in our Capitol over the past two weeks have every right to be heard. But as the days continue and we see more and more protesters coming in from Chicago and Nevada and New Jersey and in particular Washington, D.C., I am not going to allow for one minute their voices to drown out the voices of the millions of taxpayers of this state."

Some critics of Walker's proposal have said he took campaign donations last year from out-of-state conservative groups that support his efforts to strip most bargaining rights from public unions.

(Reporting by James Kelleher; Editing by Peter Bohan and Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (53)
kimsun2 wrote:
Walker for president of America.

Feb 22, 2011 8:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Humilityarrow wrote:
Democrats – add this simple amendment.

Any net profits made by any corporation greater than 5% shall be donated to the state to reduce debt now and to improve the state in the future. No employee of any corporation shall make more than $250,000.00 per year in recompense in any form or in any combination.

The bill will not pass.

Feb 22, 2011 8:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
transam30 wrote:
people of this great Nation let us not be held hostage by these public unions and be bullied by mob rule as well as have a super minority dictate that we pay these incredible compensation packages, lets turn this around and go on strike by not puchasing any union goods including cars made by unions untill they agree to follow the law that meens lawmakers back in session.

Feb 22, 2011 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.