A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters (SYRIA - Tags: CONFLICT CIVIL UNREST TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY) ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. THIS PICTURE IS DISTRIBUTED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

NOAA scientists cleared in climate email review

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:50pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. officials on Thursday cleared scientists of charges that they manipulated data about climate change in e-mails that were stolen from a British university in 2009, triggering a climate scandal.

The Department of Commerce's Inspector General conducted the independent review of e-mails taken from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England, at the request of Republican Senator James Inhofe, a climate change skeptic.

The e-mails included exchanges between researchers at the university and many of the world's top climate scientists, including employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, an office of the Commerce Department.

Some of the more than 1,000 CRU e-mails had appeared to show scientists blasting climate change skeptics and trying to block publication of certain articles.

But the review said it found no data manipulation or inappropriate procedures by NOAA scientists.

"In our review of the CRU e-mails, we did not find any evidence that NOAA inappropriately manipulated data ... or failed to adhere to appropriate peer reviewed procedures," the Inspector General wrote in a letter to Inhofe.

Several British reviews of the matter have exonerated the climate scientists of trying to manipulate data.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
WeatherRusty wrote:
The witch hunt continues. Dragging climate scientists through the mud only further erodes public opinion in the credibility of climate science. This attack on scientists and science needs to stop. The forces which brought about the dark ages still exert their negative influence on human understanding and the perpetuation of ignorance.

Feb 25, 2011 11:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
guidoLaMoto wrote:
Shame on the author of this article. He obviously only read the introductory paragraph of the report. Had he read the whole thing, he would have seen there were more than a half dozen points of possible fraud noted, and further inquiry recommended. There is more than enough evidence for Inhofe to call for Senate hearings.

Feb 26, 2011 6:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
kehvan wrote:
It’s extremely difficult to accept the notion these “scientist” were “cleared”. What’s more likely is that it’s a whitewash.

Feb 28, 2011 6:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.