HIGHLIGHTS-China drafts new rules on bank capital requirements

Related Topics

BEIJING | Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:06am EST

BEIJING Feb 25 (Reuters) - China's banking regulator has drawn up a tough new set of capital requirement rules as part of efforts to implement Basel III guidelines, according to a document obtained by Reuters on Friday.

The draft by the China Banking Regulatory Commission confirmed reports that appeared in local media this week. [ID:nTOE71K06L]

China's big banks, or systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), will be subject to a minimum capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 11.5 percent under "normal conditions".

But this could rise to 14 percent, with a counter-cyclical additional requirement up to to 2.5 percent if CBRC thinks that credit growth is abnormally strong.

Liquidity and leverage ratios will also be introduced in a broader regulatory framework for controlling bank lending and financial risks.

Following are the main highlights:

* Capital adequacy ratio

-- Minimum 11.5 percent CAR for SIFIs, in addition to a possible counter-cyclical requirement of up to 2.5 percent; new rules start in early 2012 and banks must meet the requirements by end of 2013;

-- Minimum 10.5 percent CAR for non-SIFIs, or smaller banks; no counter-cyclical requirement;

-- Minimum core tier-1 CAR requirement is set at 5 percent, which is stricter than the 4.5 percent requirement in Basel III

* Leverage ratio

-- Tier-one capital must be at least 4 percent of total on- and off-balance sheet assets; new rules start in early 2012; SIFIs to meet the requirement by end-2013, non-SIFIs by end-2016;

-- The 4 percent requirement is higher than the 3 percent minimum requirement in Basel III

* Liquidity ratios

-- Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), or the ratio between high-quality liquid assets and net cash outflows for a 30-day period, must be at least 100 percent; all banks to meet the requirements by end-2013;

-- Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), or the ratio between usable stable funding sources and needed stable funding sources, is required to be at least 100 percent; all banks to meet the requirement by end-2013

* Provisions

-- Provisions must be at least 2.5 percent of total outstanding loans;

-- Provisions must be at least 150 percent of total non-performing loans;

-- SIFIs must meet requirements by end-2013, non-SIFIs by end-2016;

* Grace period

-- In general, China requires its SIFIs to meet the new requirements by end-2013 and its non-SIFIs to meet the new rules by end-2016. Basel III set the deadline at Jan. 1, 2019.

* SIFIs

-- Criterion about SIFI have not finalised, but the biggest five lenders (Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (601398.SS)(1398.HK), China Construction Bank (601939.SS)(0939.HK), Bank of China (601988.SS)(3988.HK), Agricultural Bank of China (601288.SS)(1288.HK) and Bank of Communications Co Ltd (3328.HK)(601328.SS)) are likely to be labelled as SIFIs. (Reporting by Reuters China)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
GeorgeLekatis wrote:
This is a very interesting article. We see one of the very first attempts in the world to develop specific requirements and give specific numbers and ratios for systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs).

Note

One of the important parts of the regulatory reform is the regulation of the systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) – these institutions whose disorderly failure, because of their size, complexity and systemic interconnectedness, would cause significant disruption to the wider financial system and economic activity.

According to Jaime Caruana, General Manager, Bank for International Settlements:

“The Basel Committee and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) are developing a well integrated approach to systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) which could include some combination of capital surcharges, contingent capital and bail-in debt. In addition to these higher loss absorbency capacity measures, the FSB has stated that it expects policy towards SIFIs to include:

1. The capacity to resolve national and global SIFIs without disruption to the financial system and without taxpayer support;

2. Increased intensity of SIFI supervision; and

3. A peer review process to promote consistent national policies in this area.”

George Lekatis
http://www.basel-iii-association.com

Feb 26, 2011 11:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.