Republicans raise pressure on spending cuts

WASHINGTON Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:17pm EST

Copies of President Barack Obama's 2012 budget are unveiled on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 14, 2011. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Copies of President Barack Obama's 2012 budget are unveiled on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 14, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans in the House of Representatives on Friday called a government shutdown "unacceptable" but raised pressure on President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats to go along with deep spending cuts this year.

The two parties are fighting a pitched battle over public spending and must agree at least to a stopgap measure by next Friday or the government will run out of cash and non-essential services will shut down.

Energized by big wins in November elections, Republicans say any short-term funding for government operations must include deep savings.

"We don't want to shut the government down. This is not an acceptable or a responsible option for any of us ... but we want to see spending cuts," House Republican Leader Eric Cantor said in a telephone conference with reporters.

Republicans detailed some $4 billion in spending cuts for a two-week stopgap spending bill that the House will take up next week. The stopgap measure continues funding for two weeks for all programs except for some that already had been targeted for cuts in Obama's recent budget plan for fiscal 2012, which begins October 1.

The measure also eliminates funding that had been earmarked for lawmakers' pet projects for this year. Those include $293 million for transportation projects and $173 million for economic development projects.


A spokesman for Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid said the proposal moves House Republicans closer to his party's position. Democrats had been combing through Obama's budget proposal looking for items they could cut.

"The plan Republicans are floating today sounds like a modified version of what Democrats were talking about," Reid spokesman Jon Summers said.

Democrats have been reluctant to cut too much too soon for fear it would hurt the struggling U.S. economy.

Investment firm Goldman Sachs estimates that deep cuts of $61 billion by September in a bill passed by the Republican-dominated House last week would significantly slow U.S. economic growth in the second and third quarters of this year. That bill was declared dead by the majority Democrats in the Senate.

A $4 billion cut in spending over two weeks would trim the government at about the same rate that House Republicans won in the bill their chamber approved.

The partisan stand-off over the budget comes amid growing nervousness among investors about chaos in the oil-rich Middle East and North Africa and a U.S. government shutdown could further unnerve global financial markets.

Thousands of federal workers could be laid off in a shutdown, hitting services for millions of Americans and yielding uncertain dividends -- or punishments -- for both political parties. A shutdown would most likely begin with the museums in Washington and national parks.

Lawmakers' goal will be to agree on a short-term measure by the March 4 deadline.

Democrats want to avoid deep cuts in a temporary stopgap measure and focus negotiations on the longer-term measure instead.

The government has been running on a series of massive temporary funding bills because Congress never enacted specific appropriations bills for this fiscal year, which ends on September 30.

(Reporting by Donna Smith and Kim Dixon; Editing by Vicki Allen and Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (9)
gunste wrote:
Republicans still have amnesia about their two “cut taxes and spend and charge it” GOP Presidents and Congresses in the 1980s and 2000-2008. Now they have perpetrators remorse. –
Their effort to further expand the maldistribution of wealth in the US will only lead to social unrest and move the Independents out of their sphere of influence. They will be left with people who have money and don’t want to pay their share, the ideologues and the Know-nothings who embrace a popular slogan.

Feb 25, 2011 2:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
txgadfly wrote:
For every $1.00 in domestic cuts, cut $7.00 in Israeli support spending. They are foreigners. Foreigners! They must get in line after all US citizens are taken care of. Oh yes — my understanding is that the Treasury pays for the “black” budget too. Cut, cut, cut!

When the Republicans start talking about $800. billion in cuts for military and “foreign aid” or “foreign assistance” or “special financing” all aimed at the Middle Eastern region, then we can take them seriously. Right now they are on the level of reducing spending on Medicare wheelchair batteries. School lunches. Social Security checks. But totally unreduced spending of an estimated $1.2 trillion per year (as of 2010) bumbling around the Middle East making enemies for the American people.

So, are we supposed to pretend that the bulk of deficit spending is “protected”? Protected by whom? Why no discussion? Why? We clearly need massive political reform in the USA. Corruption has crippled accountability to the People.

Feb 25, 2011 2:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MisterG wrote:
Go Republicans….yes this might cause some economic concerns but there is nothing worse then printing of money to pay for Obama’s economic craziness. He is ruining this country little by little so stop his financial stupidity. His last job’s bill cost $225,000 per person put to work and most of them were …you got it ….more government workers who will never go away but keep slurpping from the public’s hard earned money and funds.

And while your at it …..why not make all government workers pay into the Social Security System including yourselves. Hmmm maybe that would cure the SS financial woes and put Government workers into a system the rest of us have to live with. They too, can buy 401s to better their retirements like every other working American.


Feb 25, 2011 3:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.