Wisconsin Assembly approves plan to curb unions

MADISON, Wisconsin Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:51am EST

Democratic and Republican assembly members rise before the start of a session in Madison, February 22, 2011. REUTERS/Darren Hauck

Democratic and Republican assembly members rise before the start of a session in Madison, February 22, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Darren Hauck

Related Topics

MADISON, Wisconsin (Reuters) - The Wisconsin state Assembly on Friday passed a Republican plan to curb public sector union power over the fierce objections of protesters, setting the stage for a showdown with Senate Democrats who fled the state last week to prevent a vote in that chamber.

After two all-night debating sessions and an eleventh hour Democratic bid for a compromise, the Republican-dominated Assembly abruptly ended all debate early Friday morning and approved the bill by a vote of 51 to 17.

The outcome of the vote, which was taken so fast many Democratic lawmakers who were outside the chamber when it was called were unable to participate, was greeted by chants of "it's not over yet" and "we are here to stay" from more than a thousand protesters who stayed to watch in the capitol rotunda overnight.

Tens of thousands of demonstrators, from inside and outside the state, have converged on Madison in recent days to fight the proposal, which they fear could encourage similar measures in other states and cripple the American labor movement.

Passage of the measure was never in doubt. So as the news sunk in among the demonstrators, the initial confusion quickly gave way and they were singing a spirited version of "We Shall Overcome" within minutes.

Assembly Republicans took a private elevator to an exit sealed off from protesters and did not stop for reporters.

After the vote, the Democrats assembled on a balcony overlooking the rotunda that has been home to tens of thousands of demonstrators, waving at the protesters and telling them the measure's prospects in the state Senate are more uncertain.

The protesters shouted "thank you, thank you" and pumped their fists at the lawmakers, who returned the gestures.

Representative Cory Mason, a Racine Democrat, told the demonstrators he believed the abrupt vote, which occurred while several Democrats waited to be heard on the measure, was "a violation of the rules, possibly a violation of the law."

"What happened tonight, for those of you who don't know, was unprecedented," Mason said. "They're so desperate to take away workers they will do anything to ram this through." He predicted the move would "backfire" on the GOP.

Representative Barbara Toles, a Milwaukee Democrat, urged protesters to remain peaceful and promised "the fight isn't over yet."

SENATE STANDOFF

More than 50,000 demonstrators poured into the state capital of Madison over the weekend to protest against the plan. Hundreds continued to protest inside the Capitol on Thursday, turning the building into an indoor campground.

Newly elected Republican Gov. Scott Walker has said the measure is critical to restoring Wisconsin's financial health.

"This is one of the toughest votes this body has taken in decades," Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald said in a statement posted on the website WisPolitics.com. "But we are, without question, in one of the toughest economic times our state has ever seen."

Passage of the measure in the Assembly will not ease the Senate standoff over a plan that has generated widespread protests among Wisconsin teachers and other union members.

Republicans hold a 19-14 Senate majority but need a quorum of 20 to vote on spending bills. All the Democrats left the state for Illinois last Thursday because they feared they could be compelled to attend the Senate if they remained.

Wisconsin Republicans sent police on Thursday on an unsuccessful search for the runaways. State patrol officers were dispatched to the Democrats' homes on suspicion that some have been sleeping in their own beds at night.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said he had hoped the Democrats could be convinced to return, although he acknowledged the officers cannot arrest them.

"It's a gesture that shows we're still serious and a call of the house should be honored," he told WisPolitics.com.

Walker has set a deadline of Friday for approval of the measure to give the state time to refinance bonds and make a payment on state debt that is due by March 15. He says the bill is necessary to close a budget deficit of $137 million for this fiscal year and $3.6 billion in the next two years.

OTHER STATES CONSIDER UNION CURBS

Democratic lawmakers and unionized public employees said the Walker plan is an attempt to bust the unions and choke off funding to organized labor, the largest source of funding to the Democratic Party.

If Republicans prevail in Wisconsin, other states could be inspired to take on powerful public unions. Wisconsin-inspired curbs on union rights have been debated in the legislatures of other states including Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee and Kansas.

In Indiana, Democrats boycotting the state legislature appeared to score a victory on Wednesday when a "right to work" law that would restrict unions was put aside until next year.

But Republicans proposed a rule change to extend a reading deadline on the bills from this Friday until next Friday, March 4, to keep the bills alive, said John Schorg, media relations director for the Indiana house Democrats.

U.S. state and local governments are struggling to balance budgets after the recession decimated their finances. Other states like Texas, Arizona and Ohio are relying mainly on cuts in spending, while Minnesota and Illinois are raising taxes.

The Wisconsin changes sought by Walker would make state workers contribute more to health insurance and pensions, end government collection of union dues, let workers opt out of unions and require unions to hold recertification votes every year.

Collective bargaining would be allowed only on wage increases up to the rate of inflation.

(Reporting by James Kelleher and Jeff Mayers. Editing by John Whitesides and David Bailey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (32)
Higher wrote:
why couldn’t the republican congressmen/women compromised? Didn’t they include unions like firefighters and police in exemption of this new law? So it’s not like they are fighting a battle of principle here, no? From what i’ve read the unions were willing to take the cuts specified but were primarily against the collective bargaining rules. That doesn’t really seem unreasonable to me. I don’t understand the tooth and nail fight they’ve all turned this into.

Doesn’t this just basically seal the approach the democrats will have to take? The message is “take it”, is this really the best message available to us at this point? I really wish people could act more like people and less like theater actors, compromise is possible and beneficial to all of us.

Feb 25, 2011 4:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
Evil freaks! They’re out to destroy the Middle Class. Any unbiased economist — heck, and Grade 5 math student could tell them that cutting out something that adds 2% to budget is stupid, when the Governor just put in place a huge corporate tax cut that contributes 47% to the budget. This is class warfare of the highest order! Without unions and collective bargaining, employers will rape their employees in this market!

This is nothing but a stunt to give Corporations more power over Americans and appeal to the right-wing extremist voters. In short, it’s fascism.

Feb 25, 2011 5:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
IATEACH wrote:
When I started out as a first year teacher in Iowa (9 years ago) I was making less than 23,000 and if I wanted to insure my family it would cost me over 600 dollars a month. We already are a right to work state and obiviously this shows that our unions are weak. Fortuantely, my husband had a job that could cover his insurance, or we would have been on food stamps. Our former governor Chet Culver (D) came in and worked to increase teacher pay and since we ranked extremely low compared to the nation on teacher pay. Now we have a republican who in his very first speech bashed teachers in our state. He has recently said he wants to take away the right for collective bargaining for health care. I have moved districts and now finally have gotten a job that I can cover my family with. I am frightened of what the future holds. I hope that Wisconsin continues to protest this. I will do my best in Iowa.

Feb 25, 2011 6:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.