UPDATE 6-U.S. hits Libya with sanctions, shuts embassy

Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:31pm EST

* Obama signs executive order freezing Gaddafi assets

* Ferry departs Tripoli with more than 300 aboard

* Clinton to seek unity against Libya on Geneva trip (Updates with Obama imposing sanctions)

By Ross Colvin and Alister Bull

WASHINGTON, Feb 25 (Reuters) - The United States imposed sanctions on the Libyan government on Friday and said the legitimacy of longtime Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi had been "reduced to zero."

In response to Gaddafi's bloody crackdown on an uprising against his 41-year rule, President Barack Obama signed an executive order freezing the assets of Gaddafi, his family and top officials, as well as the Libyan government, the country's central bank and sovereign wealth funds.

"These sanctions therefore target the Gaddafi government, while protecting the assets that belong to the people of Libya," Obama said in a statement.

"By any measure, Muammar Gaddafi's government has violated international norms and common decency and must be held accountable," he added.

The U.S. Treasury said the action would block substantial sums of Libyan money and prevent it being looted by the Gaddafi government, but declined to offer a dollar value.

With the Libyan crisis also being taken up at the United Nations, European Union governments agreed on the idea of imposing an arms embargo, asset freezes and a travel ban on the oil-producing North African nation, with diplomats saying a formal decision would be taken early next week. [ID:nLDE71O1YH]

Washington announced the sanctions move -- along with the closing of its embassy and withdrawal of U.S. diplomats -- after a chartered ferry and a plane carrying Americans and other evacuees left Libya earlier on Friday.

The Obama administration had been criticized for its relatively restrained response so far to the turmoil. But U.S. officials said fears for the safety of the Americans had tempered Washington's response.

"(Gaddafi) is overseeing the brutal treatment of his people ... and his legitimacy has been reduced to zero in the eyes of his people," White House spokesman Jay Carney said after Libyan security forces shot protesters in the streets of Tripoli on Friday.

Obama discussed Washington's sanctions plan with the leaders of Britain, France and Italy on Thursday and Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan on Friday.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said on Friday his government was preparing sanctions against Libya and that "Canada fully supports the United Nations Security Council on a resolution that could include a weapons embargo, individual sanctions against key Libyan officials and an asset freeze."

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Take a Look-Unrest in N.Africa, Mideast [ID:nLDE71M1AF]

Graphic on Libya unrest link.reuters.com/vec38r

Breakingviews-Banks block dictator money [ID:nLDE71O0MZ]

Reuters Insider link.reuters.com/xyb38r

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

CLINTON TO DRUM UP SUPPORT

The Obama administration said earlier this week it was studying a wide range of options, including the freezing of assets, a travel ban on members of Gaddafi's government, a "no-fly" zone over Libya and military action.

In a first step, the U.S. Treasury has told American banks to closely monitor transactions that may be related to unrest in Libya for possible signs that state assets were being misappropriated. [ID:nN25256249]

Several U.S. energy companies in Libya -- including Marathon (MRO.N), Hess (HES.N) and Occidental (OXY.N) -- have continued working through the crisis as other foreign firms have curtailed or suspended operations. [ID:nN25119999]

If sanctions gain traction internationally, Libya's oil output could be restricted.

"Although Libya is not a big supplier to the U.S., any sanctions imposed by the U.S. -- particularly on doing business with that country -- means the U.S. or other countries affected will still have to tap other suppliers," said Peter Beutel, president of trading consultants Cameron Hanover.

In New York, the U.N. Security Council was considering a French-British draft proposal for an arms embargo, financial sanctions and a request to the International Criminal Court to indict Libyan leaders for crimes against humanity. [ID:nN25134386]

The White House did not express direct support for the proposal but said it was discussing it with members of the Security Council, including the other four permanent members -- China, Russia, Britain and France.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will push for unity against Gaddafi on Monday at the U.N. Human Rights Council.

The United States resumed diplomatic ties with Libya in 2004 after Gaddafi agreed to abandon his pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.

U.S. economic sanctions were progressively removed after Libya agreed to accept civil responsibility for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland in 1988. (Reporting by Jeff Mason, Patricia Zengerle, Alister Bull, Andrew Quinn, Paul Eckert, David Morgan, David Lawder, Luke Baker in Brussels and Jeffrey Hodgson in Toronto; writing by Ross Colvin; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Peter Cooney)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
GeorgeLekatis wrote:
I was discussing with a hedge fund manager the following problem, which is more important than most can imagine. He wanted to sell short banks, and asked for the impact after the mess in Libya.

There is an interesting Basel II / Basel III related risk management issue after the facts in Libya: The calculation of “reputational risk”.

Many banks and financial organizations have been working with the authorities in Libya for years. Now they may change it, but will clients forget? How it affects the calculations of regulatory capital? It is an uncharted territory for most banks, yet it is part of their obligations.

Reputational risk can be defined as the risk arising from negative perception on the part of customers, counterparties, shareholders, investors or regulators that can adversely affect a bank’s ability to maintain existing, or establish new, business relationships and continued access to sources of funding.

Reputational risk may give rise to credit, liquidity, market and legal risk – all of which can have a negative impact on a bank’s earnings, liquidity and capital position.

The risks that arise should be incorporated into the bank’s risk management processes and
appropriately addressed in its ICAAP and liquidity contingency plans.

George Lekatis
http://www.basel-iii-association.com

Feb 26, 2011 7:22am EST  --  Report as abuse
WNS818 wrote:
“By any measure, Muammar Gaddafi’s government has violated international norms and common decency and must be held accountable,” he added.”

If this quote from the above article is what the US policy makers advocate against governments that are clearly guilty of deliberately shooting unarmed civilians whom are merely publically demonstrating for their freedom against oppression, then why has there not been sanctions brought against the Israeli government?…….Well, We all sorta know the answer to that one.

….and by the way, I am not a Jew, or an Arab, or a Muslim, or a Christian, or even religous…….just observant to the descretional application of US international policy in favour of certain Governments.

Feb 26, 2011 12:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.