Oscar telecast among least-watched, show panned

LOS ANGELES Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:36pm EST

Co-host James Franco (L), best actor nominee for his role in ''127 Hours,'' and co-host Anne Hathaway stand onstage during the 83rd Academy Awards in Hollywood, California, February 27, 2011. REUTERS/Gary Hershorn

Co-host James Franco (L), best actor nominee for his role in ''127 Hours,'' and co-host Anne Hathaway stand onstage during the 83rd Academy Awards in Hollywood, California, February 27, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Gary Hershorn

Photo

Best dressed list

People magazine picks the year`s best dressed.  Slideshow 

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Some 37.6 million Americans watched Sunday's widely-panned Oscar ceremony, making the telecast one of the least-watched Academy Awards shows of the past 10 years.

But attempts by Oscar organizers to attract a younger audience appeared to have paid off, with the show keeping 95 percent of its 18-34 year-old audience from last year, according to Nielsen ratings data on Monday.

Sunday's 37.6 million audience for broadcaster ABC was down nearly 10 percent from the 41.7 million who tuned in last year, when blockbuster "Avatar" was among the movie nominees.

But on the night when "The King's Speech" reigned with four Oscars, the telecast was still the most-watched event of the night, with more than double the audience of other TV networks combined.

ABC said its red carpet pre-show pulled in the largest audience since 2007, and that video viewing online at Oscar.com and through the Oscar Backstage Pass App surged by 29 percent to more than three million views.

Sunday's Oscar telecast was bigger than the 2009 (36.3 million) and 2008 (32 million) audiences but drew the fourth smallest audience since 2002 when "A Beautiful Mind" took the best picture trophy.

Television critics mostly slammed the show, which was hosted for the first time by actors Anne Hathaway, 28, and James Franco, 32.

The Hollywood Reporter said the ceremony "could go down as one of the worst Oscar telecasts in history."

The New York Times said "the prolonged effort to pander to younger viewers was downright painful" at times, while the Boston Herald remarked sourly that "references to the Internet, apps and Facebook do not make a show trendy, or alas, entertaining."

Time magazine said the experiment of using actors rather than traditional comedians had largely failed, while Franco in particular "seemed to retreat into a haze, smirking, squinting and clasping his hands in front of him."

Entertainment Weekly, however, said Hathaway and Franco were "marvelous Oscar hosts" calling them "funny, poised, relaxed, and smart."

(Reporting by Jill Serjeant; Editing by Bob Tourtellotte)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
JamieSamans wrote:
Meh. People don’t care about the Oscars with good reason: they don’t matter. It’s not just a popularity contest but instead is specifically a popularity contest among only those who are considered the Hollywood elite. Actual talent or performance in a given film matters less than the inevitability that someone “deserves” an Oscar for his or her overall “contribution.”

Feb 28, 2011 1:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Antrim wrote:
The Oscar shows have not been the same since Billy Crystal left as the host. If anyone is surprised they are bad, well please lower your expectations so you won’t be disappointed. Regarding last night, Franco was stiff as a board by I thought Hathaway was great and showcased her talents.

Feb 28, 2011 1:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
motamanx wrote:
I didn’t think Anne Hathaway and James Franco would be any good. I was wrong. It was a worthy Oscar night, and honor is due.

Feb 28, 2011 1:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.