Ohio panel votes to end union right to strike

COLUMBUS, Ohio Wed Mar 2, 2011 6:09pm EST

1 of 6. A large group of union supporters gather on the steps of the Ohio Statehouse to rally against Senate Bill 5 in Columbus, Ohio, March 1, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Matt Sullivan

Related Topics

COLUMBUS, Ohio (Reuters) - An Ohio state Senate panel voted on Wednesday to strip public sector unions of some collective bargaining rights and end their right to strike, in the latest swipe at the power of unions by a state.

The Senate Labor Committee vote was 7-5, with one Republican and four Democrats voting against. The measure now moves to the Republican-controlled state Senate, which could approve it as early as Wednesday.

If endorsed by the state legislature and signed by Republican Governor John Kasich, Ohio would become the biggest state so far to enact sweeping restrictions on public sector unions.

While Wisconsin has gained far more national attention, the Ohio measure is tougher in areas such as eliminating the right to strike. Ohio also is far more important to the union movement than Wisconsin, with the sixth largest number of public sector union members among states, twice the number in Wisconsin.

What began three weeks ago as a dispute between a newly-elected Republican governor and labor unions in Wisconsin, has blown up into what could be the biggest challenge to labor union power since then President Ronald Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981.

The Ohio proposal also eliminates binding arbitration of contract disputes by a neutral third party -- instead leaving the final decision to the legislative body.

"I believe public employees should be evaluated solely on their performance," said Republican State Senator Shannon Jones, the bill's sponsor.

Democrats said this is unfair, since it gives the ultimate decision to the employer. The bill also establishes merit as the only basis for pay increases, not length of service.

Republicans in Ohio said the limits to public workers' ability to bargain are necessary to give local governments flexibility and help reduce the state's two-year budget deficit of about $8 billion.

More than 8,000 protesters converged on Ohio's state capital on Tuesday to demonstrate against the proposed legislation, which would affect workers including public school teachers, firefighters and police.

At a news conference with Democrats Wednesday afternoon, representatives of fire and police unions complained that the bill would take away their ability to bargain for safety equipment, such as bullet-proof vests.

"This bill provides for our safety to be contracted out to the lowest bidder," said Jay McDonald of the Ohio Fraternal Order of Police.

The proposal approved by the committee on Wednesday was watered down from the original Republican plan. That proposal would have eliminated collective bargaining for 42,000 state workers, plus 19,500 workers in the state's university and college system. It also would have removed health care and some other benefits from the negotiating process for teachers, firefighters and police.

What emerged from the committee on Wednesday would offer only limited collective bargaining rights for wages based on performance and some benefits, but take away the right to strike for all public workers. Firefighters and police already are banned from striking. Collective bargaining would not be allowed on numerous issues, including transfers, hours and working conditions.

The limits on collective bargaining are similar to a proposal stalled in the Wisconsin state legislature but Wisconsin would not eliminate the right to strike.

Democratic senators in Wisconsin have stalled the proposal there by leaving the state to prevent Republicans from having a quorum.

Several other states also are considering union restrictions including Indiana, Tennessee, Idaho and Kansas.

Ohio only requires a simple majority to vote on bills, so it would do the Ohio Democrats no good to leave the state.

(Editing by Jerry Norton and Greg McCune)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
itmedic614 wrote:
Are you ready? The revolution will not be televised….

Going to go protest this hogwash in a little bit. Time to get out and take this country back from the invested corporate interests that have been buying our elections, and declaring war on working families. It’s time to take to the streets, and fight fight fight!!!

Mar 02, 2011 9:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
They think eliminating the competition will disguise the iron fist. This has to be obvious to all but the moronic FOX followers.

Mar 02, 2011 12:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
coriolana wrote:
End run around labour? Delightful. Go watch the American Experience: The Triangle Fire. Then talk about how evil unions are.

Mar 02, 2011 12:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.