UPDATE 1-Mortgage writedown proposal advances in U.S. probe

Fri Mar 4, 2011 5:57pm EST

* Principal reductions part of settlement proposal

* Bank fines still being negotiated (Adds comments from Iowa AG's office)

By Corbett B. Daly and Dave Clarke

WASHINGTON, March 4 (Reuters) - U.S. banks have been asked to forgive some of the amount owed on troubled mortgages in a proposal sent to them by state attorneys general and federal agencies on Thursday.

The 27-page proposal is part of a broader effort to get banks to agree to a settlement after they were accused last year of taking possibly illegal shortcuts in some foreclosure proceedings.

Banks were accused of using "robo-signers" to sign hundreds of unread documents a day and maintaining sloppy mortgage paperwork.

"What we envision is a set of requirements for how they service loans and handle foreclosures," said Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller.

Miller is spearheading the 50-state attorneys general probe into mortgage lenders' foreclosure practices.

Greenwood said the states plan to meet face to face with banks this month to hash out a deal.

U.S. regulators and a coalition of state attorneys general are negotiating a settlement over the servicing problems with the biggest mortgage lenders, including Bank of America Corp (BAC.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N).

Federal agencies and the states have said they want a single, comprehensive deal with the banks rather than a smorgasbord of separate deals.

Whether that will happen is questionable.

The banking regulators involved in the negotiations were not part of the proposal sent Thursday.

That proposal includes practices servicers would have to follow when foreclosing on properties but does not include a fine they also would have to pay, a matter that is currently being negotiated separately.

The proposal would encourage servicers to do principal writedowns to keep borrowers in their homes and provide a single point of contact for borrowers in foreclosure proceedings, according to Greenwood and another source familiar with the plan.

Greenwood said the proposal has the support of the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department, the Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission and Treasury Department staff setting up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

"These are terms that we who have signed onto these documents have agreed to," Greenwood said.

The federal agencies are working with banking regulators, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, to craft a broader settlement that would include fines on the banks but there are disagreements over the size of the penalty, according to people involved in the negotiations.

The news of the 27-page proposal being sent was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. (Reporting by Corbett B. Daly and Dave Clarke, Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
ahouse1 wrote:
The AG’s and federal regulatory agencies are going to release a detailed code of conduct regarding how the banks must treat borrowers throughout the modification process – How much is it going to cost to police that? The cost to create, extract the fines, and administer its use could pay off 10,000 predatory loans for at risk home owners. So stop waiting for the government to regulate the banks we can all see clearly they have no code of conduct. Get a good attorney and make the banks pay for every “i” not dotted and every “t” not crossed AS THE LAW PROVIDES. For those of you who pay your mortgages you should ask yourself why you are doing that? It may be more cost effective to pay a good attorney to fight the banks claim to the property as collateral to the debt and negotiate a lower figure too. Stop calling the financially challenged hard working Americans deadbeats, and take advantage of the fact that banks may be breaking the law regarding due process. You don’t have to like it but stop disparaging a fellow American for legally defending themselves against the bureaucratic nightmare our Federal government and Banking system have become….http://diligencegroupllc.net

Mar 06, 2011 8:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.