New Jersey governor wants reform of teacher ratings

TRENTON, New Jersey Fri Mar 4, 2011 9:03am EST

Related Topics

TRENTON, New Jersey (Reuters) - New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on Thursday recommended teachers be rated on the basis of student performance, adding to the debate over job evaluations as states look to layoffs to address budget gaps.

The release of the Christie administration's blueprint for schools, relying heavily on teacher evaluations based on student achievement, comes on the heels of his proposed fiscal 2012 budget seeking increased pension and health-care contributions from state employees.

New Jersey faces a deficit projected at $10.5 billion.

The question of how teachers are evaluated -- helping determine who is in line to be laid off -- has grown acute as states grapple with the costs of unionized public employees.

"You walk into a school, and everybody knows who the good teachers are and who the bad teachers are," Christie said at a news conference at the statehouse.

In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg advocates a system of laying off teachers based on performance rather than the more traditional basis of seniority.

Christie, a rising star in the Republican Party, has been at odds with the state's unions, including the teachers' New Jersey Education Association. Union leaders say they are open to higher payments but say Christie has demonized them.

"Their charge is to protect the worst teachers," Christie said on Thursday.

As Christie spoke, shouts from a rally outside of police officers and firefighters could be heard, voicing concern over Christie's proposed budget.

Asked by reporters what impact the demonstration had on him, Christie replied: "Zero."

Christie said he is not against collective bargaining -- a hot-button issue in other states struggling to close budget gaps -- but he said he preferred state-wide contracts rather that contracts with each of the state's municipalities.

In Wisconsin, which has been leading the charge in the battle over public sector unions, Gov. Scott Walker is proposing to strip them of most collective bargaining powers.

(Additional reporting by Edith Honan; Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
JackCol wrote:
Christie’s quote, “Their charge is to protect the worst teachers” means that he’s either an idiot or a liar. Obviously the unions aren’t there to protect the worst teachers. They may try to protect all teachers or they may try to protect teachers with more years of service, but the fact that Christie even said that just shows that he’s another dishonest politician.

Instead of demonizing the teachers in this country, he should be working with them to find solutions. Instead, like just about every other Republican politician out there he’s taking the easy and political way out and pitting Americans against each other. What a horrible lack of leadership.

Mar 04, 2011 1:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
pessimist88 wrote:
Who the heck would want to be a teacher these days? Low pay, crazy students, and when the parents are not involved in the success of the child in school, the teachers are blamed!

Mar 04, 2011 2:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
hsvkitty wrote:
HAH! Christies’s students are presently doing quite well. He will now see a general exodus of good teachers and teachers will no longer wish to teach in schools where the students are rowdy and unwilling to learn and there is no parent support. WHy would they???

Only an idiot would think that this is a good idea…

Historically, teachers were considered lower class and belittled as a profession. (One reason few men took the job) Christie wishes to return to those times… and so he will get his wish. Poorly paid teachers means poorer teaching… and poorer students.

Mar 04, 2011 8:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus