UPDATE 1-HSBC considering move to Hong Kong - report

Sun Mar 6, 2011 10:55am EST

Related Topics

* Move "more than likely", investors say -Sunday Telegraph

* HSBC says talk "entirely speculative and presumptuous"

(Adds comment from HSBC CEO, Chairman)

LONDON, March 6 (Reuters) - Europe's biggest bank HSBC (HSBA.L) may move its headquarters from London to Hong Kong because of what it sees as high levels of tax and red tape in the UK, according to a report in the Sunday Telegraph.

The newspaper quoted unnamed investors who said they understood a move was "more than likely" and that there had been a "change of tone" as HSBC (0005.HK) reviews its domicile, something the bank does every three years.

However, the bank maintained that it preferred to remain in the UK and said talk of an imminent change in its position was "entirely speculative and presumptuous".

"We are, however, in light of possible regulatory changes and additional costs such as the bank levy, being increasingly asked by shareholders and investors about the likely additional cost of being headquartered in the UK," said Chairman Douglas Flint and CEO Stuart Gulliver in a joint statement on Sunday.

A British tax on bank assets to be introduced this year would cost HSBC about $600 million based on its balance sheet at the end of December. That marks a cost for being based in the country, HSBC said last week as it cut its profitability targets alongside its 2010 results. [ID:nLDE71R0H3]

Political rhetoric in the UK has become more aggressive towards the banks, as public anger at the cost of the taxpayer bailout of lenders RBS (RBS.L) and Lloyds (LLOY.L) and the paying of generous bankers' bonuses has risen.

Bankers hit back after Bank of England Governor Mervyn King gave an outspoken interview in Saturday's Telegraph, in which he said the banking industry needed urgent reform and that there was a risk of a fresh crisis. [ID:nLDE7240AP]

But finance minister George Osborne defended King, saying to Sky News on Sunday: "I wouldn't be (putting King in charge of bank regulation) if I didn't broadly agree with his concerns and I'm also very particularly looking at the issue which he correctly raises which is how do we deal with the "too important to fail" problem."

The system of regulation had completely failed, Osborne said.

The Sunday Telegraph also said that the publication of a report into RBS's collapse in 2008 by the regulator, the Financial Services Authority, was likely to be delayed from March to at least April. (Reporting by Rosalba O'Brien and Keith Weir; Editing by Jon Loades-Carter)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
farmerobin wrote:
let them go, they will, presumably, want to keep their branch infrastructure intact and thus their income stream –tax the hell out of that, it can’t be that difficult surely, or is the current government as totally spineless and in the pocket of the banks as the last lot?

Mar 06, 2011 12:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.