Gates says killing of Afghan boys a "setback"

KABUL Mon Mar 7, 2011 4:55pm EST

1 of 3. Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai (R) speaks as U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates looks on during a news conference in Kabul March 7, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani

Related Video

Photo

Obama at the bar

Obama shares drinks and shoots pool during a stopover in Denver.  Slideshow 

KABUL (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates described the mistaken killing of nine Afghan boys by NATO aircraft as a "setback" on Monday as the issue overshadowed a visit to Afghanistan to assess security progress.

Gates met Afghan President Hamid Karzai on an unannounced trip to Kabul and repeated Washington's apology for the killing of the boys last week by NATO helicopters, which has increased strain on an already testy relationship with Afghan leaders.

"Not only is their loss a tragedy for their families, it is a setback for our relationship with the Afghan people," Gates told a media conference with Karzai.

Karzai complained angrily on the eve of Gates's visit, rejecting an earlier and surprisingly candid apology by General David Petraeus, commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

Civilian casualties were the greatest strain on relations with Washington, the Afghan leader said. International concern has also grown and the fallout from recent incidents threatens to hamper peace and reconciliation efforts.

Karzai will soon unveil a timetable for the start of a handover of security responsibility from foreign forces to Afghans. The process is to begin gradually in July, with all foreign combat forces to be gone by 2014.

Gates is expected to visit parts of southern and eastern Afghanistan where NATO commanders say they have weakened the Taliban and created "bubbles" of security they hope to link up.

Such recent successes meant they should be able to meet President Barack Obama's July pledge, he said.

"While no decisions on numbers have been made, in my view we will be well-positioned to begin drawing down some U.S. and coalition forces this July even as we redeploy others to different areas of the country," Gates said.

GROWING ANGER

U.S. and NATO leaders agreed to Karzai's ambitious timeline for foreign combat troops to leave, and Karzai will announce on March 21 where and when the transition will begin.

But civilian casualties have clouded the relationship and diverted attention from transition plans after a spate of recent incidents.

Analysts said making strong statements over civilian casualties allowed Karzai to rally public support, but would have little long-term effect because his relations with Washington were already so badly strained.

"That being said, there is legitimate and growing anger within Afghanistan over ISAF-caused deaths," said Joshua Foust, a fellow at the American Security Project.

The nine boys were killed while collecting firewood in volatile Kunar province. Karzai said on Sunday apologies were "not enough" and that civilian casualties caused by foreign troops were no longer acceptable.

There have been at least four similar incidents, mainly in the east, in the past three weeks.

Obama has also expressed his deep regret. U.N. figures show that insurgents are responsible for three-quarters of civilian casualties, although it is those caused by foreign forces that rile ordinary Afghans the most.

On Sunday, hundreds of Afghans chanting "Death to America" protested against civilian casualties in Kabul.

U.S. and NATO commanders have tightened procedures for using air strikes and night raids in recent years, but mistaken killings of innocent Afghans still happen, especially with U.S. and NATO forces stepping up operations against insurgents.

Civilian casualties in Afghanistan rose 20 percent to 6,215 in the first 10 months of 2010 compared with 2009, according to the latest U.N. report. Those caused by foreign and Afghan troops accounted for 12 percent, an 18 percent drop.

Major General John Campbell, ISAF commander in the east, said 90 percent of civilian casualties in his area were caused by insurgents.

(Writing by Paul Tait; Editing by Paul Taylor)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
robinyates wrote:
what I cannot understand is how the crew of the helicopter involved in the killing of these young boys are unable to differentiate between men and boys ? Either their eyesight is appallingly bad or there is something wrong with the system.Too many drugs taken to hype them up I suspect. Shameful !!!

Mar 07, 2011 2:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
It looks like the helicopters were targeting anything on the ground that moved as a criteria for opening fire.

Mar 07, 2011 2:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Heretic1 wrote:
Will the members of these crews be tried for murdering kids? If yes, where and how? If not, why?

Mar 07, 2011 3:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.