Obama and UK's Cameron urge quick exit for Gaddafi

WASHINGTON Tue Mar 8, 2011 6:04pm EST

Anti-Gaddafi rebels react as they retreat after coming under rocket fire during clashes with pro-Gaddafi forces near Ras Lanuf March 8, 2011. REUTERS/Asmaa Waguih

Anti-Gaddafi rebels react as they retreat after coming under rocket fire during clashes with pro-Gaddafi forces near Ras Lanuf March 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Asmaa Waguih

Related Video

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron agreed on Tuesday that Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi must leave power quickly and weighed steps to stop the bloodshed, including a no-fly zone.

As Obama faces growing calls at home to help Libyan rebels seeking Gaddafi's ouster, he and Cameron discussed a "full spectrum of possible responses" during their telephone call, the White House said in a statement.

The two leaders would work on planning for several options, including surveillance of Libya with spy planes, humanitarian assistance, enforcement of a United Nations arms embargo and a no-fly zone, it said.

"They agreed that the common objective in Libya must be an immediate end to brutality and violence; the departure of Gaddafi from power as quickly as possible; and a transition that meets the Libyan peoples' aspirations for freedom," the White House said.

As the international community tries to reach consensus on what to do about Libya, Britain and France are working on a U.N. Security Council resolution for a no-fly zone that could be put forward if they believe conditions warrant it.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Tuesday a no-fly zone was a practical possibility but would require "a clear legal basis, a demonstrable need and strong international support and broad support in the region and a readiness to participate in it."

Cameron told the BBC that planning was needed in case Gaddafi refuses to step down.

"I think now we have got to prepare for what we might have to do if he goes on brutalizing his own people," he said.


Obama is facing criticism, especially from Republicans, that he has been too cautious during the turmoil in Libya.

But the Obama administration is reluctant to get drawn into the conflict while the United States is entangled in Iraq and Afghanistan, stressing the need for international backing for any foreign military intervention.

U.S. officials have voiced concerns about the effectiveness of a no-fly zone.

Marine General James Amos told U.S. lawmakers that Libya's helicopter forces represent its strongest air power threat.

"There are several things that will give (Gaddafi's forces) enormous advantage. One is the ground movement of forces, vehicles," Amos said. "I think it's more than just aviation. I think it's very complex."

Senator John McCain, a vocal proponent of a no-fly zone, said he could not understand why Obama was resisting growing pressure to impose one.

"People are dying. The facts are very clear," McCain told Reuters as he left the hearing where Amos testified. "President Obama has said that Gaddafi has got to go. Wouldn't a no-fly zone be a very important way to make that happen?"

Senator John Kerry, a close Obama ally, has called for the United States to prepare for a no-fly zone and has floated the idea of bombing Libyan runways to ground Gaddafi's warplanes.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell, Alister Bull and Arshad Mohammed; Writing by Caren Bohan; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
louonboard wrote:
I can’t speak for the Brits, but as for Americans, why is Obama sticking his incompetent nose into Lybia’s business. Sure, Kahdafi is a scumbag, but so is Obama! So … Hey Mr. President, don’t you have enough problems at home to keep you busy? get to work or get another job!

Mar 08, 2011 4:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
KMurray wrote:
Libya, dear.

When a homicidal maniac is murdering civilians (including children), inaction is despicable. If you’re in a position to save lives in a situation like this, and you choose to ignore it, you’re a scumbag.

Ignoring the genocide in Darfur makes you a scumbag. Bombing civilians in Iraq? Scumbag. Promoting torture? Scumbag. War profiteering? Scumbag.

Do you long for the day when another man can fill those presidential shoes, just as Dubya did, and make things better for the top 5%, while you sit in your trailer and pine for the day that you, too, will be rich? I’m sure the republicans will appreciate your voting history and gaudy accoutrements, so longs as you’ll contribute to their campaigns. Good luck with that.

Mar 08, 2011 8:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
aliou wrote:
No more lives for oil

Mar 08, 2011 8:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus