Republican Shelby roughs up Fed nominee Diamond

WASHINGTON Tue Mar 8, 2011 1:18pm EST

Professor Peter Diamond smiles while speaking to reporters after winning the 2010 Nobel Prize for Economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts October 11, 2010. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

Professor Peter Diamond smiles while speaking to reporters after winning the 2010 Nobel Prize for Economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts October 11, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top Republican on the U.S. Senate banking panel on Tuesday made clear he still opposes Federal Reserve nominee Peter Diamond, calling him an "old-fashioned" Keynesian supporter of big government.

The opposition from Sen. Richard Shelby to a nomination Republicans have already scuttled twice poses a challenge to President Barack Obama, who must decide how much political capital he wants to spend to push for Diamond's approval.

"It is clear to many of us that he does not possess the appropriate background, experience, or policy preferences to serve on the (Fed's) Board of Governors," the Alabama Republican said of the MIT professor and Nobel laureate.

Diamond won approval from the banking panel twice last year -- both on party-line 16-7 votes -- but Republicans blocked his consideration by the full Senate, which is needed before he can take a seat on the influential seven-member Fed board.

While Democrats control the Senate, a single senator can hold up a nomination and Obama was forced to renominate Diamond earlier this year.

Diamond would be a likely supporter of the Fed's easy money policies, which have been criticized by many Republicans, and would further strengthen the prevailing consensus.

"There's going to be a lot of opposition to Diamond's nomination for a lot of reasons," Shelby told reporters after the hearing. "Let's see how the process works. A lot of us have differences with him."


Shelby criticized Diamond for his lack of experience in monetary policy. He also said Diamond is not qualified to serve because another Fed governor, Daniel Tarullo, is from Boston, where Diamond currently resides.

Fed board governors are supposed to represent different parts of the country, but that requirement has in the past been interpreted loosely.

The Alabama lawmaker added that the panel had set a precedent by blocking the nomination of former President George W. Bush's choice to serve on the Fed, Randall Kroszner. Shelby said Kroszner's nomination foundered over his free-market views.

"Policy preferences of Fed nominees matter," Shelby said. "Dr. Diamond is an old-fashioned, big government Keynesian."

Democrats expressed support for Diamond based on his Nobel prize and his study of unemployment and how wages are affected by regulation and economic policy.

"The president has sent us ... extremely qualified individuals," said committee Chairman Tim Johnson, speaking of Diamond and two nominees to the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Johnson quoted economist and Nobel prize winner James Mirrlees as saying of Diamond: "No economist is smarter."

Another Republican member of the panel, Pat Twoomey of Pennsylvania, grilled Diamond over the Fed's extensive support for the economy. The Fed cut short-term rates to near zero in December 2008 and has embarked on asset-buying campaigns that will total $2.3 trillion by mid-year.

Diamond said the Fed's $600 billion bond-buying program has been an effective tool and played down concerns about inflation. "The issue is, going forward, are there signs that inflation might be picking up quickly?" he said in response to questions from lawmakers. "I view commodity prices as driven by micro factors, not general stimulation of the economy."

Johnson said he would like to move forward on the nomination as soon as possible but gave no date for when a committee vote would be scheduled. If the panel approves the nomination, as expected, it would face a final vote in the full Senate. The entire process could take months.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
ginchinchili wrote:
Of course good ol’ boy Shelby is going to oppose Diamond. Conservatives hate intelligence. Anyone educate is suspect. That’s why Wisconsin’s governor is their new hero. The highest education level he completed was high school, but the conserves are willing to overlook that limited bit of learnin’.

Besides, the Repubs made it clear that their number one goal was to thwart everything Obama wants to do, even though it leaves our federal government hamstrung and ineffective. Ahh, but who cares about that. The main thing is to give complete control of our country to a handful of wealthy Republican contributors like the Kock Brothers. Their dream is a country full of cheap slave labor, and they’re well on their way to achieving that dream.

Shelby needs to retire to his fishing camp and leave governing to those who actually attended their civics class.

Mar 08, 2011 11:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
Eideard wrote:
Shelby never figured out the Keynesian reforms worked the first time around.

He probably doesn’t realize FDR was elected more than once either. probably thinks term limits were suggested for something more than stopping popular politicians.

Mar 08, 2011 5:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.