How humans got big brains, barbless penises

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Wed Mar 9, 2011 1:02pm EST

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Missing chunks of DNA responsible for turning genes on and off help explain some key differences between chimpanzees and humans -- including why humans have big brains and why the human penis is not covered with prickly spines, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

The study, published in the journal Nature, reinforces the notion that genes that control the activity of other genes play a big role in what makes humans so different from other mammals.

To study this, David Kingsley of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Stanford University School of Medicine in California and colleagues compared the genetic code of humans to chimpanzees -- man's closest relative -- and other mammals.

They found 510 gene segments that are present in chimps and other mammals, but are missing in humans.

Nearly all of these were regulatory genes -- genetic switches that turn up or down the volume of nearby genes.

Then the team did a computer analysis to identify deleted DNA segments that were clustered around particular genes.

"We saw more changes than you would expect near genes involved in steroid hormone signaling," Kingsley said in a statement.

A number of deletions also appeared near genes involved in brain development.

The team kept narrowing the pool until they found a few dozen genes that they thought were involved in the evolution of particular human traits.

They found one of sections of DNA deleted in the human genome was responsible for producing sensory whiskers, such as those in mice, and prickly spines, like those found on the penises of many mammals.

"People are always surprised to hear that the penis of many organisms are covered with these spines," Kingsley said in a telephone interview.

He said penile spines, or barbs, are typically present in species that mate quickly, such as male chimpanzees who must compete to fertilize one or two receptive females.

These spines -- made from keratin, the protein found in fingernails -- often lie over sensory receptors, and some experiments suggest removing them makes copulation last longer.

For humans, losing these penile spines might have prolonged intercourse and helped make monogamous relationships a more attractive option, the team said.

Even more interesting to Kingsley, however, is that another of the DNA deletions was located near a gene that kept brain cell growth in check. The deletion of this DNA may have contributed to the development of larger brains in humans, he said.

Both of these traits may be related to meeting the reproductive needs of humans, which give birth to babies with large brains, requiring parents to mate in pairs -- at least long enough to care for their big-headed offspring.

"Pair bonding is good if you are trying to raise relatively helpless infants," Kingsley said.

More than just explaining physical differences in human evolution, however, the team hopes eventually to discover important physiological differences, including why humans are susceptible to diseases such as arthritis, cancer, malaria, HIV, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
DrJJJJ wrote:
The missing links are still missing! Einstein said science without religion is inept! Micro evolution yep, macro-nope! The macro evolution faith movement is the greatest hoax in history and we’re teaching it to our kids as gospel with has lead to secularization of church and state-big mistake! Only God!

Mar 09, 2011 2:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
USAPragmatist wrote:
Wow DRJJJJ, the mentality of your posts never cease to amaze me.

Please explain how evolution is the ‘greatest hoax in history’? The scientific evidence for evolution is overwhelming.

Now what is more likely the greatest hoax in history is god itself, there is a million times more proof of evolution then god. Espicially since there is ZERO evidence of a mysterious all powerful man(in most viewpoints) in the sky.

Mar 09, 2011 4:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
whatdisgust wrote:
USAPragmatist- And yet from a totally unbiased perspective both your posts sound the same espousing your particular preferred history of creation with no hard evidence cited or given.

If I was an alien and read both your posts, i’d judge religion and science equally worthless in educating others.

Mar 09, 2011 5:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.