Illinois Gov. Quinn signs bill banning death penalty

CHICAGO Wed Mar 9, 2011 2:02pm EST

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn gestures at a news conference introducing the 2010 Ford Taurus at the Ford assembly plant in Chicago, Illinois August 4, 2009. REUTERS/Frank Polich

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn gestures at a news conference introducing the 2010 Ford Taurus at the Ford assembly plant in Chicago, Illinois August 4, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Frank Polich

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The governor of Illinois signed a law on Wednesday abolishing capital punishment, an issue that has roiled the state since a series of wrongful convictions led to a decade-long moratorium on executions.

When the law signed by Democratic Governor Pat Quinn takes effect on July 1, Illinois will become the fourth state in the past two years after New York, New Jersey and New Mexico to dispense with the death penalty.

The ultimate punishment will still be an option in 34 states and for federal inmates. Most Western democracies no longer carry out executions.

"In Illinois there is no question in my mind that abolishing the death penalty is the right thing," in light of the exonerations, said Ron Safer, an attorney who has defended death penalty cases.

"It is naive to think that we haven't executed an innocent person. We stop looking after they're executed."

Quinn also commuted the death sentences of all 15 prisoners on the state's Death Row.

According to Amnesty International, there were 2,390 people executed in 25 nations in 2008, with China executing more than half, followed by Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United States, Pakistan and Iraq.

Illinois has not executed anyone since 1999 and former Republican Governor George Ryan gained international acclaim from capital punishment opponents when he halted executions in 2000.

Ryan pronounced the state's death penalty system "broken," saying he was appalled by more than a dozen faulty convictions exposed by the Chicago Tribune newspaper and Northwestern University journalism students.

The errors were blamed on forced confessions, unreliable witnesses, and incompetent legal representation.

Two days before he left office in 2003, Ryan cleared the state's Death Row by commuting to life in prison the sentences of 164 inmates.

"No state had tried harder to fix its death penalty system, but after 10 years it became patently clear that it was broken beyond repair," said Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA, in a statement.

Cox said this is also true in other death penalty states, including Connecticut, Maryland and Montana, where a death penalty ban is under consideration.

"Governor Quinn has shown great human rights leadership by recognizing the wisdom of abolishing an antiquated, ineffective and inhumane punishment."

Barack Obama, then a Democratic state senator in Illinois, was among the legislators who engineered subsequent reforms that included videotaping of confessions.

Quinn invited both sides to discuss whether he should sign the bill, or modify it. Prosecutors in the state and relatives of murder victims urged him to keep the death penalty for the most heinous crimes, while opponents including Sister Helen Prejean lobbied him to sign the law abolishing the practice.

The number of executions in the United States dropped 12 percent last year to 46, and were down from 98 in 1999, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. The Center said there have been 138 exonerations of Death Row inmates since 1973.

(Reporting by Mary Wisniewski and Andrew Stern; Editing by Jerry Norton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Whys wrote:
We waste too much time contemplating this issue. It’s not about the executed, it’s about ourselves. We already know that the death penalty has never been applied equally and every reason to believe that it never can be. That said, those executed are typically guilty of truly heinous crimes. Thus we need not waste sympathy on them and when you consider all the things in this world in need of greater equality, this issue just doesn’t make the cut when it comes to importance. So either continue the death penalty with the realization that is likely unequal in its punishment of heinous people (who cares), or end the death penalty for realization that vengeance, no matter how justified, improves nothing. It’s not about the executed, it’s about us. So just decide to decide and move on so we can stop wasting our time on this issue.

Mar 09, 2011 3:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.