U.S. banking groups join debit fee legal battle

Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:16pm EST

* Banking groups file brief in support of TCF lawsuit

* TCF claims debit fee crackdown is unconstitutional

By Dave Clarke

WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) - National banking groups representing firms of all sizes are getting behind a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a crackdown on debit card processing fees.

On Friday the groups announced they had filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of a lawsuit the banking unit of TCF Financial Corp (TCB.N) filed in October against the Federal Reserve, which is charged with implementing limits on the fees.

Among those joining the Friday filing are the American Bankers Association, the Financial Services Roundtable, the Independent Community Bankers of America, and the National Association of Federal Credit Unions.

Banks and retailers have mounted a massive lobbying campaign over Fed proposals on limiting "interchange" fees, which merchants pay banks and credit-card networks every time a customer buys something with a debit card.

The limits are called for in the Durbin amendment in the Dodd-Frank financial reform law enacted last summer.

The Fed in December proposed capping the fees at about 12 cents per transaction -- a 75 percent cut. The banking industry estimates this would cost them $12 billion annually.

The brief filed by the banking groups argues that the Fed proposal goes too far.

"The Board's erroneous interpretation of the Durbin amendment threatens to wreak havoc on this vital component of our nation's economy and to cause substantial structural disruptions to the financial-services industry," the groups wrote in their brief.

In its lawsuit against the Fed, TCF argued that the fee crackdown required by the law is unconstitutional because it applies only to about 1 percent of U.S. banks -- those with assets of $10 billion or more -- and because it will set a fee that takes into account only a narrow aspect of a service's cost.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota. It named as defendants a number of top federal officials, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen

The Justice Department is seeking to have the case dismissed. TCF filed additional legal briefs in defense of its suit last week.

TCF is seeking a preliminary injunction to postpone the lower fee limit from going into effect. A hearing is scheduled for April 4.

A final Federal Reserve rule implementing a fee cap is due April 21, but Bernanke has said it may take longer.

Banks and card companies are pushing Congress to pass legislation that would at least delay the rule. Senator Richard Durbin, the crackdown's author and the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, has vowed to fight such efforts.

The case is TCF National Bank v. Bernanke et al, U.S. District Court, District of South Dakota, No. 10-04149. (Reporting by Dave Clarke, Editing by John Wallace)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
ThoseWhoServe wrote:
Once again, we have the financial sector and the banks telling us that we don’t understand.

The banks tell us that if we don’t stop reductions in the fees for debit card transactions they will be unable to provide banking services for low-income customers and will have to reduce services for the rest of their customers..

Apparently, after charging the low income customers $39 for penalties for exceeding credit card limits or bouncing checks, and giving them hgh interest, high profit sub-prime loans, they just find themselves unable to provide actual banking services to lower-income customers. Of course, to be fair, they extended the same $39 for penalties for exceeding credit card limits or bouncing checks to almost all their customers.

Of course it would be rude to mention that the banking industry would be far better off if they simply spent less money paying bonuses, spent less money on marketinging dozens or hundreds of different kinds of credit cards offerings, or simpy only loaned money to people with jobs and a history of paying back what they borrowed.

They tell that a fee of $0.12/transaction for debit cards is too low. Unfortunately, since they neglect to tell us just what it does cost, we have no way of knowing if a fee of $0.12 is too low, or perhaps too high.

There is no much left to offer to a banking system that loans money out to customers at high interest rates with an exotic package of fees, while paying 1% to their depositors, borrowing from the Fed at rates somewhere between 0% and 3% when they say they cannot afford to stay in business.

Perhaps they should consider another line of business, or just evaluate the business model of the credit unions, 99% of whom came through the financial debacle in reasonably good shape and still continue to retain customer and client services as their prime responsibility; not large bonuses and vacations in the Hamptons.
.

Mar 12, 2011 7:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.